| Issue |
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 371, 2026
9th International Congress on Thermal Sciences (AMT’2026)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 03011 | |
| Number of page(s) | 8 | |
| Section | Renewable Energy and Clean Technologies | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202637103011 | |
| Published online | 22 May 2026 | |
https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202637103011
A Bibliometric Analysis of Energy Management Research: A Comparison between Scopus and Web of Science
1 Enginnering Sciences and Applications Laboratory (LSIA), Abdelmalek Essadi University, Tetouan, Morocco
2 EMIsys, Mohammadia school of Engineerie, Rabat, Morocco
3 Enginnering Sciences and Applications Laboratory (LSIA), EST NADOR - Mohammed I University of Oujda, Oujda, Morocco
* Corresponding author: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Published online: 22 May 2026
Abstract
The increasing volume of research on energy management has made bibliometric analysis an essential tool for mapping scientific trends and evaluating research impact. However, bibliometric outcomes are strongly influenced by the choice of the bibliographic database. This study presents a comparative bibliometric analysis of energy management research based on Scopus and Web of Science. Using an identical search strategy and time span, articles and reviews were retrieved from both databases and analysed using the Bibliometrix R-package. The comparison focuses on key bibliometric indicators and the results reveal significant differences between the two databases. These findings emphasize the importance of database selection in bibliometric studies and provide methodological insights for researchers conducting bibliometric analyses in the field of energy management.
Key words: Bibliometrix / R-package / energy management / artificial intelligence
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2026
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.