EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 344 (2025) EPJ Web Conf., 344 (2025) 01005 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 344, 2025
AI-Integrated Physics, Technology, and Engineering Conference (AIPTEC 2025)
Article Number 01005
Number of page(s) 10
Section AI-Integrated Physics, Technology, and Engineering
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202534401005
Published online 22 December 2025
  1. V. Adelia, R. I. I. Putri, and Zulkardi, A systematic literature review: how do we support students to become numerate?. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education. 13, 1816–1824 (2024). https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i3.26849 [Google Scholar]
  2. R. D. Maharani and D. Dasari, Numeracy literacy ability viewed by characteristics of students’ way of thinking. KnE Social Sciences. 9, 633–641 (2024). https://doi.org/10.18502/KSS.V9I13.15967 [Google Scholar]
  3. K. Glüer-Pagin and L. Spectre, Where is the motivation in motivated numeracy?. Rev Philos Psychol. 16, 481–498 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/S13164-024-00737-W [Google Scholar]
  4. S. Y. Duma, Muslimin, A. S. Modjo, and A. Walid, The role of mathematics education in developing critical thinking skill in the industrial era 5.0. Aksioma Education Journal. 1, 1–10 (2024). https://doi.org/10.62872/RCA4PY44 [Google Scholar]
  5. F. R. Wahidah, F. R. Putra, and A. F. Nugrahaeni, Statistic course: can it improves numeric reasoning ability?. Journal of Learning Theory and Methodology. 3, 53–58 (2022). https://doi.org/10.17309/JLTM.2022.2.01 [Google Scholar]
  6. S. A. Pratiwi, N. Robiah, N. Peni, and A. Prabowo, Study on literacy numeracy towards students’ logic mathematics: a literature review. Numeracy. 11, 58–69 (2024). https://doi.org/10.46244/NUMERACY.V11I1.2601 [Google Scholar]
  7. D. M. Anggraini, H. Mubarok, and I. F. Sari, Improving critical thinking character through numeracy literacy for elementary school students. Dawuh Guru: Jurnal Pendidikan MI/SD. 5, 137–148 (2025). https://doi.org/10.35878/GURU.V5I1.1807 [Google Scholar]
  8. L. M. Rizki and N. Priatna, Mathematical literacy as the 21st century skill. J Phys Conf Ser. 1157, 042088 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742- 6596/1157/4/042088 [Google Scholar]
  9. V. Geiger, M. Goos, and H. Forgasz, A rich interpretation of numeracy for the 21st century: a survey of the state of the field. ZDM Mathematics Education. 47, 531–548 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/S11858-015-0708-1 [Google Scholar]
  10. R. Oktiana Akbar and R. O. Akbar, The role of formative assessment in enhancing students’ numeracy literacy: a qualitative evaluation. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA. 11, 160–166 (2025). https://doi.org/10.29303/JPPIPA.V11I7.11905 [Google Scholar]
  11. D. S. Nusantara, Zulkardi, and R. I. Indra Putri, How to design PISA-like digital mathematics problems: a preliminary study. AIP Conf Proc. 3046, (2024). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0194756 [Google Scholar]
  12. I. Saputra, A. Kurniawan, M. Yanita, E. Y. Putri, and M. Mahniza, The evolution of educational assessment: how artificial intelligence is shaping the trends and future of learning evaluation. The Indonesian Journal of Computer Science. 13, (2024). https://doi.org/10.33022/IJCS.V13I6.4465 [Google Scholar]
  13. J. O. Okafor, The role of digital tools in assessment and their impact on educational practices. Indonesian Journal of Innovative Teaching and Learning. 2, 58–71 (2025). https://doi.org/10.64420/IJITL.V2I1.202 [Google Scholar]
  14. H. Retnawati et al,A systematic review of the use of technology in educational assessment practices: lesson learned and direction for future studies. International Journal of Robotics and Control Systems. 4, 1656–1693 (2024). https://doi.org/10.31763/ijrcs.v4i4.1572 [Google Scholar]
  15. H. Fauziyatun and H. Retnawati, The challenges of using ICT in mathematics education assessment: a literature review. AIP Conf Proc. 2575, (2022). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0108031 [Google Scholar]
  16. H. G. Weigand, J. Trgalova, and M. Tabach, Mathematics teaching, learning, and assessment in the digital age. ZDM - Mathematics Education. 56, 525–541 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/S11858- 024-01612-9 [Google Scholar]
  17. Ģ. Burgmanis, M. Mikīte, I. France, and D. Namsone, Development of computer-based diagnostic assessment system: case study of equivalence of paper-and-pencil and computer- based testing. SOCIETY. INTEGRATION. EDUCATION. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference. 1, 613–622 (2023). https://doi.org/10.17770/SIE2023VOL1.7096 [Google Scholar]
  18. V. Adelia, R. I. I. Putri, and Zulkardi, A systematic literature review: how do we support students to become numerate?. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education. 13, 1816–1824 (2024). https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i3.26849 [Google Scholar]
  19. D. Hains, M. Intindola, D. Lepisto, and B. Wagner, Scrimmage! teaching quantitative literacy through a multidimensional simulation. The International Journal of Management Education. 17, 119–129 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJME.2019.01.002 [Google Scholar]
  20. H. R. Auliya, M. Christianti, and B. Hidayat, Development of multi-tier diagnostic tests for primary schools: a systematic literature review. Jurnal Prima Edukasia. 13, 59–74 (2025). https://doi.org/10.21831/JPE.V13I1.76906 [Google Scholar]
  21. V. Saputri, Y. S. Kusumah, T. Turmudi, and A. Jupri, Global trend of numeracy research: a bibliometric analysis using scopus database. Euler: Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika, Sains dan Teknologi. 13, 188–194 (2025). https://doi.org/10.37905/EULER.V13I2.33003 [Google Scholar]
  22. N. Ibrahim, M. A. Zailani, and H. S. A. Hamid, Assessment literacy measures: a comprehensive bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Education, Psychology and Counseling (IJEPC). 9, 146–163 (2024). https://doi.org/10.35631/IJEPC.953013 [Google Scholar]
  23. P. Junpeng et al,Validation of a digital tool for diagnosing mathematical proficiency. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education. 9, 665–674 (2020). https://doi.org/10.11591/IJERE.V9I3.20503 [Google Scholar]
  24. N. Kalyani, M. Chagamreddy, and S. Kaliki, A comprehensive survey on traditional and automated tools for academic learning difficulties. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology. 12, (2024). https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2024.64205 [Google Scholar]
  25. K. Alalawi, R. Athauda, and R. Chiong, Contextualizing the current state of research on the use of machine learning for student performance prediction: a systematic literature review. Engineering Reports. 5, e12699 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/ENG2.12699 [Google Scholar]
  26. J. A. Moral-Muñoz, E. Herrera-Viedma, A. Santisteban-Espejo, and M. J. Cobo, Software tools for conducting bibliometric analysis in science: an up-to-date review. Profesional de la Información. 29, (2020). https://doi.org/10.3145/EPI.2020.ENE.03 [Google Scholar]
  27. J. Baas, M. Schotten, A. Plume, G. Côté, and R. Karimi, Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies. Quantitative Science Studies. 1, 377–386 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1162/QSS_A_00019 [Google Scholar]
  28. M. J. Page et al,The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 372, (2021). https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJ.N71. [Google Scholar]
  29. S. Büyükkidik A bibliometric analysis: a tutorial for the bibliometrix package in R using IRT literature. Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology. 13, 164–193 (2022). https://doi.org/10.21031/EPOD.1069307 [Google Scholar]
  30. N. J. van Eck and L. Waltman, Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics. 84, 523–538 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/S11192-009-0146-3 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. I. Passas, Bibliometric analysis: the main steps. Encyclopedia. 4, 1014–1025 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/ENCYCLOPEDIA402006 5 [Google Scholar]
  32. W. Hassan and A. E. Duarte, Bibliometric analysis: a few suggestions. Curr Probl Cardiol. 49, 102640 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CPCARDIOL.2024.1026 40 [Google Scholar]
  33. S. Sukarno, N. H. P. S. Putro, I. Fitrianingsih, Y. A. Alsamiri, F. M. A. Gharamah, and I. A. G. Tatin, Exploring the perceptions of literacy in assessment for learning among high school English teachers. REID (Research and Evaluation in Education). 10, 143–154 (2024). https://doi.org/10.21831/REID.V10I2.71324 [Google Scholar]
  34. Lumaurridlo, H. Retnawati, H. C. A. Kistoro, and H. Putranta, School readiness assessment: study of early childhood educator experience. Elementary Education Online. 20, 468–478 (2021). https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2021.01.041 [Google Scholar]
  35. J. Way, J. Bobis, J. Lamb, and J. Higgins, Researching curriculum, policy and leadership in mathematics education. In Research in Mathematics Education in Australasia 2012–2015. Springer Singapore. 49–71 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1419-2_4 [Google Scholar]
  36. C. M. Sari, A. Ridwan, Ridwan, Y. Sastrawijaya, and Sastrawijaya, Learning environment of numeracy: development and validation with confirmatory factor analysis and rasch model. Pedagogika. 153, 185–198 (2024). https://doi.org/10.15823/p.2024.153.9 [Google Scholar]
  37. H. Bisri, Y. Rahmawati, and A. Ridwan, Inventory for measuring higher-order thinking learning environment. New Educational Review. 73, 162–174 (2023). https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.2023.73.3.12 [Google Scholar]
  38. K. Hidayati, Budiyono, and Sugiman, Developing scale to measure students’ honesty characters on mathematics learning using subject scaling. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan. 22, 143–153 (2018). https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v22i2.19310 [Google Scholar]
  39. V. Dierkx, B. van de Rijt, D. Hessen, H. van Luit, and S. van Viersen, Early numeracy development as a foundation of mathematics achievement in primary education. Learn Individ Differ. 121 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102706 [Google Scholar]
  40. A. M. Silver and M. E. Libertus, Environmental influences on mathematics performance in early childhood. Nature Reviews Psychology. 1, 407–418 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022- 00061-z [Google Scholar]
  41. G. O’Hara, H. Kennedy, M. Naoufal, and T. Montreuil, The role of the classroom learning environment in students’ mathematics anxiety: a scoping review. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 92, 1458–1486 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1111/BJEP.12510 [Google Scholar]
  42. D. Dumas, D. McNeish, J. Sarama, and D. Clements, Preschool mathematics intervention can significantly improve student learning trajectories through elementary school. AERA Open. 5, (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419879446 [Google Scholar]
  43. X. Yang and G. Kaiser, The impact of mathematics teachers’ professional competence on instructional quality and students’ mathematics learning outcomes. Curr Opin Behav Sci. 48, 101225 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COBEHA.2022.101225 [Google Scholar]
  44. T. Fan, J. Song, and Z. Guan, Integrating diagnostic assessment into curriculum: a theoretical framework and teaching practices. Language Testing in Asia. 11, 1–23 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/S40468-020-00117-Y [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.