EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 372 (2026) EPJ Web Conf., 372 (2026) 01002 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 372, 2026
Advanced Power Systems (APS 2026)
Article Number 01002
Number of page(s) 7
Section Intelligent, Digital and Resilient Power Systems
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202637201002
Published online 11 June 2026
  1. S. Jaman et al., Development and validation of V2G technology for electric vehicle chargers using Combo CCS Type 2 connector standards. Energies 15, 7364 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/en15197364 [Google Scholar]
  2. R. Rana, T.S. Saggu, S.S. Letha et al., V2G based bidirectional EV charger topologies and its control techniques: a review. Discover Applied Sciences 6, 588 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-024-06297-z [Google Scholar]
  3. Department of Energy, Bidirectional Charging and Electric Vehicles for Mobile Storage, [Online]. Available: https://www.energy.gov/femp/bidirectional-charging-and-electric-vehicles-mobile-storage. (Accessed Oct. 21, 2025) [Google Scholar]
  4. IEEE Application Guide for IEEE Std 1547-2018, IEEE Standard for interconnection and interoperability of distributed energy resources with associated electric power systems interfaces. IEEE Std 1547.2-2023, 1–291, May 20 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEESTD.2024.10534228 [Google Scholar]
  5. IEEE Standard for harmonic control in electric power systems. IEEE Std 519-2022 (Revision of IEEE Std 519-2014), 1–31, Aug. 5 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEESTD.2022.9848440 [Google Scholar]
  6. IEC 60364-7-722:2018, Low-voltage electrical installations – Part 7-722: Requirements for special installations or locations – Supplies for electric vehicles [Google Scholar]
  7. IEC 62955:2018, Residual direct current detecting device (RDC-DD) to be used for mode 3 charging of electric vehicles, 1st ed. [Google Scholar]
  8. S. Czapp, H. Tariq, S. Cieslik, Behavior of residual current devices at earth fault currents with DC component. Sensors 22, 8382 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/s22218382 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bituo Technik, Should you integrate RDC-DD or Type B RCD in your EV charger design? A guide for EVSE engineers, Feb. 22 (2025). Available: www.bituo-technik.com/rdc-dd-vs-type-b-rcd-ev-charger-design-guide/ [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Froese, New residual current-monitoring sensor for bi-directional OBCs. EV Engineering Online, Nov. 18 (2024). Available: www.evengineeringonline.com/new-residual-current-monitoring-sensor-for-bi-directional-obcs/ [Google Scholar]
  11. G. Jia, H. Guo, F. Niu, X. Wang, A novel thyristor-based DC circuit breaker with integrated current limiting reactors. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 246, 111676 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2025.111676 [Google Scholar]
  12. G. Arena, A. Chub, M. Lukianov, R. Strzelecki, D. Vinnikov, G. DeCarne, A comprehensive review on DC fast charging stations for electric vehicles: standards, power conversion technologies, architectures, energy management, and cybersecurity. IEEE Open Journal of Power Electronics 5, 1573–1611 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1109/OJPEL.2024.3466936 [Google Scholar]
  13. S. Rahimpour, O. Husev, D. Vinnikov, Design and analysis of a DC solid-state circuit breaker for residential energy router application. Energies 15, 9434 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/en15249434 [Google Scholar]
  14. IEC 61643-11:2025, Low-voltage surge protective devices – Part 11: Surge protective devices connected to AC low-voltage power systems – Requirements and test methods [Google Scholar]
  15. UL 1449:2017, Standard for safety for surge protective devices [Google Scholar]
  16. IEC 61643-31:2018, Low-voltage surge protective devices – Part 31: Requirements and test methods for SPDs for photovoltaic installations [Google Scholar]
  17. A. Moradi, A. Akbari Foroud, Analysis of transient overvoltages in EV charging stations due to direct lightning strikes. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib. 19, e70001 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1049/gtd2.70001 [Google Scholar]
  18. J. Király, Zs. Čonka, E. Rácz, J. Pálfi, F. Molnár, Vehicle-to-grid (V2G) charging of electric vehicles and its influence on microgrid operations, from the perspective of electric vehicle utilization. Acta Polytech. Hung. 21, 285–304 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  19. M. Bobček, R. Štefko, J. Šimčák, Zs. Čonka, A novel approach to day-ahead forecasting of battery discharge profiles in grid applications using historical daily data. Batteries 11, 370 (2025). https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries11100370 [Google Scholar]
  20. V. Patil, A. Barkade, Comprehensive review on the design and implementation of single-phase bi- directional EV chargers for efficient V2G and G2V operations. Intern. J. of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management 9, 1–9 (2025). https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM51837 [Google Scholar]
  21. N. Munusamy, I. Vairavasundaram, Enhancing grid stability and V2G integration by optimizing three-phase bidirectional EV chargers using ANFIS and FPGA-based control systems. Glob. Energy Interconnect. (in press, corrected proof) (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloei.2025.06.002 [Google Scholar]
  22. D. Prajapati, B. Saxena, Control of bidirectional power transfer in grid-tied fast electric vehicle charging system, in Proceedings of the 2025 IEEE International Conference on Interdisciplinary Approaches in Technology and Management for Social Innovation (IATMSI), Gwalior, India (2025), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/IATMSI64286.2025.10985579 [Google Scholar]
  23. J. Ye et al., Cyber–physical security of powertrain systems in modern electric vehicles: vulnerabilities, challenges, and future visions. IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Power Electron. 9, 4639–4657 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/JESTPE.2020.3045667 [Google Scholar]
  24. M. Ali et al., A smart digital twin enabled security framework for vehicle-to-grid cyber-physical systems. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 18, 5258–5271 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1109/TIFS.2023.3305916 [Google Scholar]
  25. B. Sah, P. Kumar, S.K. Bose, A fuzzy logic and artificial neural network-based intelligent controller for a vehicle-to-grid system. IEEE Syst. J. 15, 3301–3311 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSYST.2020.3006338 [Google Scholar]
  26. W. Kempton et al., A test of vehicle-to-grid (V2G) for energy storage and frequency regulation in the PJM system: results from an industry-university research partnership, Tech. Rep., University of Delaware, Pepco Holdings, Inc., PJM Interconnect, Green Mountain College (2008, clarified 2009). Available: www1.udel.edu/V2G/resources/test-v2g-in-pjm-jan09.pdf [Google Scholar]
  27. A. Briones et al., Vehicle-to-grid (V2G) power flow regulations and building codes review by the AVTA, Tech. Rep., Idaho National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy (2012). Available: www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2014/02/f8/v2g_power_flow_rpt.pdf [Google Scholar]
  28. H.R. Baghaee et al., Anti-islanding protection of PV-based microgrids consisting of PHEVs using SVMs. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 11, 483–500 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2019.2924290 [Google Scholar]
  29. B. Yu, M. Matsui, G. Yu, A review of current anti- islanding methods for photovoltaic power system. Sol. Energy 84, 745–754 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2010.01.018 [Google Scholar]
  30. A.G. Abd-Elkader, S.M. Saleh, Zero non-detection zone assessment for anti-islanding protection in rotating machines based distributed generation system. Int. J. Energy Res. 45, 521–540 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/er.5705 [Google Scholar]
  31. T. Skocil et al., Passive and active methods of islanding for PV systems, in Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications, Barcelona, Spain (2009), 1–10. Available: www.upcommons.upc.edu/bitstreams/7b25c7a9-9b0b-4255-adf7-e416a6278bde/download [Google Scholar]
  32. F. Yang et al., An anti-islanding protection method based on voltage-synchronous impedance angle measurements. Energies 16, 7139 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/en16207139 [Google Scholar]
  33. IREC, Vehicle-to-grid (V2G) standards (2022). Available: www.irecusa.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Paving_the_Way_V2G-Standards_Jan.2022_FINAL.pdf (Accessed Oct. 21, 2025) [Google Scholar]
  34. T. Basso, IEEE 1547 and 2030 standards for distributed energy resources interconnection and interoperability with the electricity grid, Tech. Rep. NREL/TP-5D00-63157, National Renewable Energy Laboratory (2015). Available: www.docs.nrel.gov/docs/fy15osti/63157.pdf [Google Scholar]
  35. IEEE Std 1547.1-2020, IEEE standard conformance test procedures for equipment interconnecting distributed energy resources with electric power systems and associated interfaces (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEESTD.2020.9097534 [Google Scholar]
  36. A. Kersten et al., Review of technical design and safety requirements for vehicle chargers and their infrastructure according to national Swedish and harmonized European standards. Energies 14, 3301 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/en14113301 [Google Scholar]
  37. E. Alghsoon, A. Harb, M. Hamdan, Power quality and stability impacts of vehicle to grid (V2G) connection, in Proceedings of the 8th International Renewable Energy Congress (IREC), Amman, Jordan (2017), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/IREC.2017.7925995 [Google Scholar]
  38. M.A.S. Masoum, S. Deilami, S. Islam, Mitigation of harmonics in smart grids with high penetration of plug-in electric vehicles, in Proceedings of the IEEE PES General Meeting, Minneapolis, MN, USA (2010), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/PES.2010.5589970 [Google Scholar]
  39. Mirus International, A practical and effective way of applying IEEE Std 519-2014 harmonic limits. Available: www.mirusinternational.com/downloads/White%20Paper%20-%20IEEE%20Std%20519-2014%20Harmonic%20Limits.pdf (Accessed Oct. 21, 2025) [Google Scholar]
  40. Comsys, Power quality – IEEE 519-2022. Available: www.comsys.se/en-us/our-adf-technology/power-quality-ieee-519-2022/ (Accessed Oct. 21, 2025) [Google Scholar]
  41. P. Holcsik, J. Pálfi, Zs. Čonka, I.B. Kocsis, Fault point location method, based on harmonics analysis of a distribution system. Acta Polytech. Hung. 19, 147–162 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  42. E. Villa-Ávila et al., Improving V2G systems performance with low-pass filter and fuzzy logic for PV power smoothing in weak low-voltage networks. Appl. Sci. 15, 1952 (2025). https://doi.org/10.3390/app15041952 [Google Scholar]
  43. U.R.D. Suchitra, Fault ride through in grid integrated hybrid system using FACTS device and electric vehicle charging station. Energies 14, 3828 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/en14133828 [Google Scholar]
  44. S. Chemate et al., Over current protection of electric car charging station. Int. Res. J. Mod. Eng. Technol. Sci. 6 (2024). https://doi.org/10.56726/IRJMETS52219 [Google Scholar]
  45. H. Awad, E.H.E. Bayoumi, Next-generation smart inverters: bridging AI, cybersecurity, and policy gaps for sustainable energy transition. Technologies 13, 136 (2025). https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies13040136 [Google Scholar]
  46. C. Hannahs, The importance of using the latest National Electrical Code for electric vehicle charger installations, NFPA Blog (2024). Available: www.nfpa.org/news-blogs-and-articles/blogs/2024/05/13/importance-of-using-the-latest-nec-for-ev-charger-installations [Google Scholar]
  47. Bourns, How to select the right SPD for EV charging systems. Available: www.bourns.com/docs/technical-documents/technical-library/surge-protective-devices/how_to_choose_the_right_spd_for_ev_charging_systems_appnote.pdf (Accessed Oct. 21, 2025) [Google Scholar]
  48. IEC 62305-1:2024, Protection against lightning – Part 1: General principles [Google Scholar]
  49. Google Patents, CN112994150A, Overcurrent and overvoltage fault protection system and method for V2G charging pile. Available: www.patents.google.com/patent/CN112994150A/en (Accessed Oct. 21, 2025) [Google Scholar]
  50. H. Ramakrishnan, J. Rangaraju, Power topologies in electric vehicle charging stations, Application Report SLLA497, Texas Instruments (2020). Available: www.ti.com/lit/an/slla497/slla497.pdf [Google Scholar]
  51. Z. Wang et al., Overview of isolated bidirectional DC–DC converter topology and switching strategies for electric vehicle applications. Energies 17, 2434 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/en17102434 [Google Scholar]
  52. G. Jia, H. Guo, F. Niu, X. Wang, A novel thyristor-based DC circuit breaker with integrated current limiting reactors. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 246, 111676 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2025.111676 [Google Scholar]
  53. M. Escoto et al., Optimization challenges in vehicle-to-grid (V2G) systems and artificial intelligence solving methods. Appl. Sci. 14, 5211 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/app14125211 [Google Scholar]
  54. D. Buvarp, Design and evaluation of heavy electric vehicle DC charging overcurrent protection, M.S. thesis, University West, Trollhättan, Sweden (2022). Available: www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1670732/FULLTEXT01.pdf [Google Scholar]
  55. J.L. Kilkenny, M.S.J. Wilson, Gynecological emergencies, in Mini-invasive Approach in Acute Care Surgery, F. Coccolini et al. (eds.), Springer, Cham (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39001-2_22 [Google Scholar]
  56. H. Qin et al., A digital-controlled SiC-based solid state circuit breaker with soft switch-off method for DC power system. Electronics 8, 837 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics8080837 [Google Scholar]
  57. A. Pogulaguntla et al., A thyristor controlled bidirectional DC solid state circuit breaker for residential microgrids, in Proceedings of the IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM), Seattle, WA, USA (2024), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/PESGM51994.2024.10688567 [Google Scholar]
  58. H.-R. Tseng, A secure and privacy-preserving communication protocol for V2G networks, in Proceedings of the IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), Paris, France (2012), 2706–2711. https://doi.org/10.1109/WCNC.2012.6214259 [Google Scholar]
  59. M. Bobček, R. Štefko, Zs. Čonka, Electrical protection systems for the evolving microgrid environment. Acta Polytech. Hung. 20, 159–178 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  60. R. Kheirollahi et al., A DC solid-state circuit breaker based on transient current commutation. IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Power Electron. 10, 4614–4625 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/JESTPE.2021.3116605 [Google Scholar]
  61. I. Diahovchenko, I. Yevtushenko, M. Kolcun, Zs. Čonka, T. Zahorodnia, P. Vasyleha, Demand- supply balancing in energy systems with high photovoltaic penetration using flexibility of nuclear power plants. Acta Polytech. Hung. 20, 115–130 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  62. F. Naseri, H. Samet, A comparison study of high power IGBT-based and thyristor-based AC to DC converters in medium power DC arc furnace plants, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Compatibility and Power Electronics (CPE), Costa da Caparica, Portugal (2015), 14–19. https://doi.org/10.1109/CPE.2015.7231042 [Google Scholar]
  63. IEC 60529:1989+AMD2:2013, Degrees of protection provided by enclosures (IP Code) [Google Scholar]
  64. K. Sevdari et al., Efficiency of bidirectional EV charging: key insights from implementing ISO 15118-20 CCS2 and CHAdeMO. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 83, 104654 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2025.104654 [Google Scholar]
  65. S. Yazdanipour et al., An overview of cyber- physical security in electric vehicle charging technologies, in Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (ISIE), Toronto, ON, Canada (2025), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISIE62713.2025.11124726 [Google Scholar]
  66. M.A. Razzaque et al., Cybersecurity in vehicle-to- grid (V2G) systems: a systematic review. Appl. Energy 398, 126364 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126364 [Google Scholar]
  67. M. Ali et al., A smart digital twin enabled security framework for vehicle-to-grid cyber-physical systems. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 18, 5258–5271 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1109/TIFS.2023.3305916 [Google Scholar]
  68. M.S. Hossain, C. Rodine, E.E. Tsiropoulou, A blockchain and PKI-based secure vehicle-to- vehicle energy-trading protocol. Energies 17, 4245 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/en17174245 [Google Scholar]
  69. D. Vásquez-Cardona et al., Impacts of electric vehicle penetration on the frequency stability of Curaçao’s power network. World Electr. Veh. J. 16, 264 (2025). https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj16050264 [Google Scholar]
  70. IEC 62262:2002, Degrees of protection provided by enclosures for electrical equipment against external mechanical impacts (IK code) [Google Scholar]
  71. DriveElectric.gov, Physical safety and security at electric vehicle charging sites. Available: www.driveelectric.gov/files/physical-site-security.pdf (Accessed Oct. 21, 2025) [Google Scholar]
  72. Z. Varga, M. Bobček, Zs. Čonka, E. Rácz, Machine learning-based prediction of dye- sensitized solar cell efficiency for manufacturing process optimization. Energies 18, 5011 (2025). https://doi.org/10.3390/en18185011 [Google Scholar]
  73. E. Kinoti, J. Michael, Review of electric vehicle- to-grid (V2G). Eng. Open Access 2, 1–11 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  74. M. Kolcun, A. Gawlak, M. Kornatka, Zs. Čonka, Active and reactive power losses in distribution transformers. Acta Polytech. Hung. 17, 161–174 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  75. ISO 15118-20:2022, Road vehicles – Vehicle-to- grid communication interface – Part 20: Network and application protocol requirements [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.