EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 372 (2026) EPJ Web Conf., 372 (2026) 01003 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 372, 2026
Advanced Power Systems (APS 2026)
Article Number 01003
Number of page(s) 8
Section Intelligent, Digital and Resilient Power Systems
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202637201003
Published online 11 June 2026
  1. H.J. Laaksonen, Protection principles for future microgrids. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 25, 2910–2918 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2010.2066990 [Google Scholar]
  2. H. Lahiji, F. Badrkhani Ajaei, R.E. Boudreau, Non-pilot protection of the inverter-dominated microgrid. IEEE Access 7, 142190–142202 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2944137 [Google Scholar]
  3. V.C. Gungor et al., Smart grid technologies: communication technologies and standards. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 7, 529–539 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2011.2166794 [Google Scholar]
  4. J. Bencsik, Z. Čonka, M. Bobček, Modbus-based communication for low-voltage grid monitoring and control, in Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Applied Computational Intelligence and Informatics (SACI), Timișoara, Romania (2025), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/SACI66288.2025.11030103 [Google Scholar]
  5. M.N. Alam, S. Chakrabarti, A. Ghosh, Networked microgrids: state-of-the-art and future perspectives. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 15, 1238–1250 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2018.2881540 [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Srivastava et al., Modeling cyber-physical vulnerability of the smart grid with incomplete information. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 4, 235–244 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2012.2232318 [Google Scholar]
  7. R. Tan et al., Modeling and mitigating impact of false data injection attacks on automatic generation control. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 12, 1609–1624 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/TIFS.2017.2676721 [Google Scholar]
  8. A.G. Phadke, J.S. Thorp, Computer relaying for power systems, 2nd ed. (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 2009) [Google Scholar]
  9. T.S. Sidhu, Y. Yin, Modelling and simulation for performance evaluation of IEC 61850-based substation communication systems. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 22, 1482–1489 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRD.2006.886788 [Google Scholar]
  10. A. Hooshyar, M.A. Azzouz, E.F. El-Saadany, Distance protection of lines emanating from full- scale converter-interfaced renewable energy power plants—Part I: problem statement. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 30, 1770–1780 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRD.2014.2369479 [Google Scholar]
  11. Y. Liu, P. Ning, M.K. Reiter, False data injection attacks against state estimation in electric power grids. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. Secur. 14, 13 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1145/1952982.1952995 [Google Scholar]
  12. D. Singhal, S. Som, L. Ahuja, A review: IoT based smart grid, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Reliability, Infocom Technologies and Optimization (ICRITO), Noida, India (2021), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRITO51393.2021.9596157 [Google Scholar]
  13. R. Fujdiak et al., Development of IQRF technology: analysis, simulations and experimental measurements. Elektron. Elektrotech. 25, 72–79 (2019). https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.eie.25.2.22739 [Google Scholar]
  14. S.M.A.A. Abir et al., IoT-enabled smart energy grid: applications and challenges. IEEE Access 9, 50961–50981 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3067331 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. A.K.M. Habib et al., False data injection attack in smart grid cyber physical system: issues, challenges, and future direction. Comput. Electr. Eng. 107, 108638 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2023.108638 [Google Scholar]
  16. M.N. Dazahra et al., A defense-in-depth cybersecurity for smart substations. Int. J. Electr. Comput. Eng. 8, 4423–4431 (2018). https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v8i6.pp4423-4431 [Google Scholar]
  17. C. Tu et al., Big data issues in smart grid – a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 79, 1099–1107 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.134 [Google Scholar]
  18. F. Federici, D. Martintoni, V. Senni, A zero-trust architecture for remote access in industrial IoT infrastructures. Electronics 12, 566 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12030566 [Google Scholar]
  19. S. Mitra, N.R. Saxena, E.J. McCluskey, Common- mode failures in redundant VLSI systems: a survey. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 49, 285–295 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1109/24.914545 [Google Scholar]
  20. J. Sexauer, P. Javanbakht, S. Mohagheghi, Phasor measurement units for the distribution grid: necessity and benefits, in Proceedings of the IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference (ISGT), Washington, DC, USA (2013), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISGT.2013.6497828 [Google Scholar]
  21. K. Jia et al., High frequency impedance based fault location in distribution system with DGs. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 9, 807–816 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2016.2566673 [Google Scholar]
  22. F. Coffele, C. Booth, A. Dyśko, An adaptive overcurrent protection scheme for distribution networks. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 30, 561–568 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRD.2013.2294879 [Google Scholar]
  23. V.C. Gungor et al., Smart grid technologies: communication technologies and standards. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 7, 529–539 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2011.2166794 [Google Scholar]
  24. V. Telukunta et al., Protection challenges under bulk penetration of renewable energy resources in power systems: a review. CSEE J. Power Energy Syst. 3, 365–379 (2017). https://doi.org/10.17775/CSEEJPES.2017.00030 [Google Scholar]
  25. C. Chandraratne et al., Adaptive protection for microgrid with distributed energy resources. Electronics 9, 1959 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9111959 [Google Scholar]
  26. R. Das et al., Centralized substation protection and control (2015). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.2114.0568 [Google Scholar]
  27. E. Sortomme, S.S. Venkata, J. Mitra, Microgrid protection using communication-assisted digital relays. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 25, 2789–2796 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRD.2009.2035810 [Google Scholar]
  28. A. Manowska et al., The use of the MQTT protocol in measurement, monitoring and control systems as part of the implementation of energy management systems. Electronics 12, 17 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12010017 [Google Scholar]
  29. M.H. Cintuglu et al., A survey on smart grid cyber-physical system testbeds. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 19, 446–464 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2016.2627399 [Google Scholar]
  30. L. Xuan, Y. Li, Research and implementation of Modbus TCP security enhancement protocol. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1213, 052058 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1213/5/052058 [Google Scholar]
  31. H. Khurana et al., Design principles for power grid cyber-infrastructure authentication protocols, in Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Honolulu, HI, USA (2010), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2010.136 [Google Scholar]
  32. A. Sinha et al., Cyber physical defense framework for distributed smart grid applications. Front. Energy Res. 8, 621650 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2020.621650 [Google Scholar]
  33. V. Lytvyn et al., Intelligent system of a smart house, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Information and Communications Technologies (AICT), Lviv, Ukraine (2019), 282–287. https://doi.org/10.1109/AIACT.2019.8847748 [Google Scholar]
  34. R. Machlev et al., Explainable artificial intelligence techniques for energy and power systems: review, challenges and opportunities. Energy AI 9, 100169 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyai.2022.100169 [Google Scholar]
  35. R. Deng, P. Zhuang, H. Liang, False data injection attacks against state estimation in power distribution systems. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 10, 2871–2881 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2018.2813280 [Google Scholar]
  36. B. Satchidanandan, P.R. Kumar, Dynamic watermarking: active defense of networked cyber– physical systems. Proc. IEEE 105, 219–240 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2016.2575064 [Google Scholar]
  37. M. Bobček, R. Štefko, Zs. Čonka, Electrical protection systems for the evolving microgrid environment. Acta Polytech. Hung. 20, 159 (2023). https://doi.org/10.12700/APH.20.11.2023.11.10 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.