Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 374, 2026
1st International Conference on Electronic, Optical Devices and Intelligent Systems (ICEODIS 2026)
Article Number 02004
Number of page(s) 9
Section Artificial Intelligence and Data Science
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202637402004
Published online 24 June 2026
  1. R.J.A. Little, D.B. Rubin. Statistical analysis with missing data, 3rd edn, (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, 2019) [Google Scholar]
  2. C.K. Enders. Missing data: An update on the state of the art. Psychological methods, 30, 2 (2025), pp. 322-339. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000563 [Google Scholar]
  3. S. van Buuren. Flexible imputation of missing data, 2nd edn, (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2018) [Google Scholar]
  4. D.B. Rubin. Inference and missing data. Biometrika, 63, 3 (1976), pp. 581-592. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/633581 [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  5. R.J.A. Little, D.B. Rubin. Statistical analysis with missing data: developments and future directions. Statistical Science, 35, 3 (2020), pp. 414T25. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119482260 [Google Scholar]
  6. A.P. Dempster, N. M. Laird, D. B. Rubin. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) 39, 1 (1977), pp. 1-38. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2984875 [Google Scholar]
  7. R.R. Andridge, R.J.A. Little. A review of hot deck imputation for survey non-response. International Statistical Review, 78, 1 (2010), pp. 40-64, PMID: 21743766; PMCID: PMC3130338. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.2010.00103.x [Google Scholar]
  8. D.B. Rubin. Statistical matching using file concatenation with adjusted weights and multiple imputations. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 4, 1 (1986), pp. 87-94. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.1986.10509497 [Google Scholar]
  9. P.L. Roth. Missing data: a conceptual review for applied psychologists. Personnel Psychology, 47, 3, (1994), pp. 537-560. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111zj.1744-6570.1994.tb01736.x [Google Scholar]
  10. S. van Buuren, K. Groothuis-Oudshoorn. mice: Multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 45, 3, (2011), pp. 1-67. doi: https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v045.i03 [Google Scholar]
  11. O. Troyanskaya, M. Cantor, G. Sherlock, P. Brown, T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani, D. Botstein, R.B. Altman. Missing value estimation methods for DNA microarrays. Bioinformatics, 17, 6, (2001), pp. 520-525, PMID: 11395428. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/17.6.520 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. D.J. Stekhoven, P. Bühlmann. MissForest: nonparametric missing value imputation for mixedtype data. Bioinformatics, 28, 1 (2012), pp. 112118. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr597 [Google Scholar]
  13. M. Amiri, R. Jensen. Missing data imputation using fuzzy-rough methods. N euroco mputing, 205, (2016), pp. 152-164. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016yj.neucom.2016.04.015 [Google Scholar]
  14. S. Nikfalazar, C.H. Yeh, S. Bedingfield, H.A. Khorshidi. Missing data imputation using decision trees and fuzzy clustering with iterative learning. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 62, 6 (2020), 2419-2437. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-019-01427-1 [Google Scholar]
  15. L. Gondara, K. Wang. MIDA: multiple imputation using denoising autoencoders. In Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (PAKDD 2018), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 10939, pp. 260-272, (Springer, Cham, 2018) [Google Scholar]
  16. D.P. Kingma, M. Welling. Auto-encoding variational Bayes. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR 2014) (2014) [Google Scholar]
  17. A. Nazabal, P.M. Olmos, Z. Ghahramani, I. Valera. Handling incomplete heterogeneous data using VAEs. Pattern Recognition, 107, 107501 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2020.107501 [Google Scholar]
  18. Z. Che, S. Purushotham, K. Cho, D. Sontag, Y. Liu. Recurrent neural networks for multivariate time series with missing values. Sci Rep, 8, 6085 (2018). doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-24271-9 [Google Scholar]
  19. J. Yoon, J. Jordon, M. van der Schaar. GAIN: missing data imputation using generative adversarial nets. In Proceedings of the 35 th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2018), pp. 5689-5698 (PMLR, Stockholm, 2018) [Google Scholar]
  20. S. Li, X. Jin, Y. Xuan, X. Zhou, W. Chen, Y.X. Wang, X. Yan. Enhancing the locality and breaking the memory bottleneck of Transformer on time series forecasting. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32 (NeurIPS 2019), (Curran Associates, Vancouver, 2019) [Google Scholar]
  21. Y. Song, J. Sohl-Dickstein, D.P. Kingma, A. Kumar, S. Ermon, B. Poole. Score-based generative modeling through stochastic differential equations. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR 2021) (2021) [Google Scholar]
  22. Y. Gorishniy, I. Rubachev, V. Khrulkov, A. Babenko. Revisiting deep learning models for tabular data. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 34 (NeurIPS 2021), pp. 18932-18943 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  23. N. Hollmann, S. Müller, K. Eggensperger, F. Hutter. TabPFN: a Transformer that solves small tabular classification problems in a second. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR 2023) (2023) [Google Scholar]
  24. Q. Gan, L. Gong, D. Hu, Y. Jiang, X. Ding. A hybrid missing data imputation method for batch process monitoring dataset. Sensors, 23, 21, 8678 (2023). doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/s23218678 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.