EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 376 (2026) EPJ Web Conf., 376 (2026) 01007 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 376, 2026
6th International Conference on Recent Advances in Mechanical Engineering and Nanomaterials (ICRAMEN 2026)
Article Number 01007
Number of page(s) 11
Section Material Science and Nanomaterials
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202637601007
Published online 01 July 2026
  1. Williams S.W., Martina, F., Addison, A.C., Ding, J., Pardal, G., Colegrove, P., Wire + arc additive manufacturing, Mater. Sci. Technol. 32(7), 641–647 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1179/1743284715Y.0000000073 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ding D., Pan Z., Cuiuri D., Li H., Wire-feed additive manufacturing of metal components: Technologies, developments and future interests, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 81(1-4), 465–481 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7077-3 [Google Scholar]
  3. Martina F., Mehnen J., Williams S.W., Colegrove P., Wang F., Investigation of the benefits of plasma deposition for the additive layer manufacture of Ti-6Al-4V, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 212(6), 1377–1386 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2012.02.002 [Google Scholar]
  4. Min J., Kuhlenkötter B., Shu C., Störkle D., Thyssen L., Experimental and numerical investigation on incremental sheet forming with flexible die-support from metallic foam, J. Manuf. Process. 31, 605–612 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2017.12.013 [Google Scholar]
  5. Frazier W.E., Metal additive manufacturing: A review, J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 23(6), 1917–1928 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-014-0958-z [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. DebRoy T., Wei H.L., Zuback J.S., Mukherjee T., Elmer J.H., Milewski J.O., Beese A.M., Wilson-Heid A., De A., Zhang W., Additive manufacturing of metallic components: Process, structure and properties, Prog. Mater. Sci. 92, 112–224 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.10.001 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Suryakumar S., Karunakaran K.P., Bernard A., Chandrasekhar U., Weld bead modeling and process optimization in hybrid layered manufacturing, Comput.-Aided Des. 43(4), 331–344 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2011.01.006 [Google Scholar]
  8. Xiong J., Zhang G., Gao H., Wu L., Modeling of bead width in robot GMAW-based additive manufacturing, J. Intell. Manuf. 25(1), 35–44 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-012-0671-1 [Google Scholar]
  9. Cao J., Pan Z., Cuiuri D., Li H., Development of a robotic wire and arc additive manufacturing system, J. Mech. Eng. 47(20), 75–81 (2011). https://doi.org/10.3901/JME.2011.20.075 [Google Scholar]
  10. Geng H., Li J., Xiong J., Lin H., Zhang F., Optimization of process parameters for wire and arc additive manufacturing of Al-Mg alloy using response surface methodology, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 250, 347–356 (2017). https://doi.Org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.07.037 [Google Scholar]
  11. Montgomery D.C., Design and Analysis of Experiments, 9th edn. (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2017). [Google Scholar]
  12. Box G.E.P., Draper N.R., Empirical Model-Building and Response Surfaces (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1987). [Google Scholar]
  13. Khuri A.I., Mukhopadhyay S., Response surface methodology, WIREs Comput. Stat. 2(2), 128–149 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.73 [Google Scholar]
  14. Fang X., Zhang L., Chen J., Huang Y., Microstructure and mechanical properties of 2219-Al alloy fabricated by wire arc additive manufacturing, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 95(1-4), 287–295 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-1206-y [Google Scholar]
  15. American Welding Society, Specification for Carbon Steel Electrodes and Rods for Gas Shielded Arc Welding (AWS A5.18/A5.18M:2011) (American Welding Society, Miami, FL, 2011). [Google Scholar]
  16. Ravisankar V., Balasubramanian V., Malarvizhi S., Effect of welding parameters on friction stir welding of aluminum alloys, Procedia Eng. 97, 1994–2003 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.443 [Google Scholar]
  17. Reis A., Diniz F., Davim J.P., Robotic arc welding optimization using design of experiments and genetic algorithms, Robot. Comput.-Integr. Manuf. 28(2), 180–187 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2011.08.004 [Google Scholar]
  18. Vander Voort G.F., Metallography: Principles and Practice (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1984). [Google Scholar]
  19. Mitutoyo Corporation, User Manual for Vickers Microhardness Testing Systems (Mitutoyo Corporation, Kawasaki, 2020). [Google Scholar]
  20. I.S. Kim, J.S. Son, C.E. Park, I.J. Kim, H.H. Kim, "A Study on the Relationship Between Process Parameters and Bead Geometry in GMA Welding," Journal of Materials Processing Technology 132(1-3), 225–230 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00414-2 [Google Scholar]
  21. P.K. Palani, N. Murugan, "Selection of Parameters of GMAW to Clad 317L Stainless Steel on Structural Steel Using Response Surface Methodology," Journal of Materials Processing Technology 175(1-3), 383–391 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.04.022 [Google Scholar]
  22. D. Karayel, "Prediction and Control of Surface Roughness in CNC Turning Using Artificial Neural Networks," Journal of Materials Processing Technology 209(9), 43764384 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.11.049 [Google Scholar]
  23. K. Easterling, Introduction to the Physical Metallurgy of Welding, 2nd ed. (Butterworth- Heinemann, Oxford, 1992). [Google Scholar]
  24. O. Grong, Metallurgical Modelling of Welding, 2nd ed. (Institute of Materials, London, 1997). [Google Scholar]
  25. S. Kou, Welding Metallurgy, 2nd ed. (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, 2003). [Google Scholar]
  26. S.S. Babu, "The Mechanism of Phase Transformations in the Weldments of Structural Steels," Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science 8(3-4), 267–278 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cossms.2004.09.004 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.