Microscopic modeling of direct pre-equilibrium emission from neutron induced reactions on even and odd actinides
EPJ Web Conf., 146 (2017) 12002
Published online: 2017-09-13
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
Microscopic Nuclear Reaction Models: Bridging Microscopic Theory and Nuclear Data. In Memory of Eric Bauge
Marc Dupuis, P. Dimitriou, R. Capote and G. SchnabelEPJ Web of Conferences 322 01001 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202532201001
Prompt Fission Neutron Spectra of 240Pu(n, F), 239Pu(n, F), and 238U(n, F)
V. M. MaslovPhysics of Particles and Nuclei Letters 20 (4) 565 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1134/S1547477123040490
Anisotropy of Prompt Fission Neutron Spectra of 239Pu(n, F) and 235U(n, F)
V. M. MaslovPhysics of Particles and Nuclei Letters 20 (6) 1373 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1134/S1547477123060262
Spectra of Prompt Fission Neutrons in the Reactions $${}^{{235}}$$U($${n,F}$$) and $${}^{{239}}$$Pu($${n,F}$$)
V. M. MaslovPhysics of Atomic Nuclei 86 (5) 627 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063778823050307
Collective enhancement in the exciton model
M. R. Mumpower, D. Neudecker, H. Sasaki, et al.Physical Review C 107 (3) (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.107.034606
Importance of the residual nucleus level density in the calculation of the 239Pu(n, 2n)238Pu excitation function
Olivier Bouland, Vincent Méot, Olivier Roig, et al.EPJ Web of Conferences 284 03009 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202328403009
СПЕКТРЫ МГНОВЕННЫХ НЕЙТРОНОВ ДЕЛЕНИЯ В РЕАКЦИЯХ \({}^{\boldsymbol{235}}\)U(\(\boldsymbol{n,F}\)) И \({}^{\boldsymbol{239}}\)Pu(\(\boldsymbol{n,F}\))
В. М. МасловЯдерная физика 86 (5) 562 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044002723050318
MEASUREMENT OF 182,184,186W (N, N’ γ) CROSS SECTIONS AND WHAT WE CAN LEARN FROM IT
Greg Henning, Antoine Bacquias, Catalin Borcea, et al.EPJ Web of Conferences 247 09003 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202124709003
Measurement of U238(n,n′γ ) cross section data and their impact on reaction models
M. Kerveno, M. Dupuis, A. Bacquias, et al.Physical Review C 104 (4) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.104.044605
310 3 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58082-7_1
Pu239(n,2n)Pu238cross section measurement using a recoil method
Vincent Méot, Olivier Roig, Benoit Laurent, et al.Physical Review C 103 (5) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.103.054609
What can we learn from (n,xnγ) cross sections about reaction mechanism and nuclear structure?
Maëlle Kerveno, Marc Dupuis, Catalin Borcea, et al.EPJ Web of Conferences 239 01023 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202023901023
Astronuclear Physics: A tale of the atomic nuclei in the skies
M. Arnould and S. GorielyProgress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 112 103766 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2020.103766
How to produce accurate inelastic cross sections from an indirect measurement method?
Maëlle Kerveno, Greg Henning, Catalin Borcea, et al.EPJ Nuclear Sciences & Technologies 4 23 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1051/epjn/2018020
Mass number and excitation energy dependence of the Θ /Θ parameter of the spin cut-off factor in the formation of an isomeric pair
S. Sudár and S.M. QaimNuclear Physics A 979 113 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2018.09.039
Potential sources of uncertainties in nuclear reaction modeling
Stephane Hilaire, Eric Bauge, Pierre Chau Huu-Tai, et al.EPJ Nuclear Sciences & Technologies 4 16 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1051/epjn/2018014