Issue |
EPJ Web of Conferences
Volume 119, 2016
The 27th International Laser Radar Conference (ILRC 27)
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 04006 | |
Number of page(s) | 4 | |
Section | Poster Session (Spaceborne Lidar) | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201611904006 | |
Published online | 07 June 2016 |
https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201611904006
Looking Into CALIPSO Climatological Products: Evaluation and Suggestions from EARLINET
1 Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche – Istituto di Metodologie per l’Analisi Ambientale (CNRIMAA), Potenza, Italy
2 Andalusian Institute for Earth System Research, University of Granada (IISTA-CEAMA), Spain
3 Institute for Astronomy, Astrophysics, Space Applications and Remote Sensing, National Observatory of Athens, Greece
4 Centro de Geofísica de Évora (CGE), Évora, Portugal
5 Consorzio Nazionale Interuniversitario per le Scienze Fisiche della Materia, Napoli Research Unit, Italy
6 Leibniz Institute for Tropospheric Research, Leipzig, Germany
* Email: nikolaos.papagiannopoulos@imaa.cnr.it
Published online: 7 June 2016
CALIPSO (Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Pathfinder Satellite Observations) Level 3 (CL3) data were compared against EARLINET (European Aerosol Research Lidar Network) monthly averages obtained by profiles during satellite overpasses. Data from EARLINET stations of Évora, Granada, Leipzig, Naples and Potenza, equipped with advanced multi-wavelength Raman lidars were used for this study. Owing to spatial and temporal differences, we reproduced the CL3 filtering rubric onto the CALIPSO Level 2 data. The CALIPSO monthly mean profiles following this approach are called CALIPSO Level 3*, CL3*. This offers the possibility to achieve direct comparable datasets. In respect to CL3 data, the agreement typically improved, in particular above the areas directly affected by the anthropogenic activities within the planetary boundary layer. However in most of the cases a subtle CALIPSO underestimation was observed with an average bias of 0.03 km-1. We investigated the backscatter coefficient applying the same screening criteria, where the mean relative difference in respect to the extinction comparison improved from 15.2% to 11.4%. Lastly, the typing capabilities of CALIPSO were assessed outlining the importance of the correct aerosol type (and associated lidar ratio value) assessment to the CALIPSO aerosol properties retrieval.
© Owned by the authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2016
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.