EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 201, 2019The XXII International Scientific Conference of Young Scientists and Specialists (AYSS-2018)
|Number of page(s)||5|
|Section||Condensed Matter Physics|
|Published online||04 February 2019|
Comparative analysis of DFT-vdW vs. Coulomb energies for configurational space of layered cathode material at different delithiation levels
Samara Center for Theoretical Materials Science, Samara University, Samara, Russia
2 Samara Center for Theoretical Materials Science, Samara State Technical University, Samara, Russia
* Corresponding author: firstname.lastname@example.org
Published online: 4 February 2019
Doping and intercalation ion disordering complicate drastically computer modeling of cathode material properties and behavior during charge-discharge processes. For layered cathode material, parameters of the energetically favored entries of compositional/configurational spaces (CCS) are known to correlate well with the CCS mean values. For the CCS (20760 configurations) of commercially used Li1-xNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2, a comparative analysis of electrostatic energies and those obtained using first-principles calculations was performed. Based on the Coulomb energy values, the CCS subgroups containing energetically favorable configurations (ca. 25% of the total number of CCS entries) can be identified reliably for Li deficiencies x ≤ 0.5. Further delithiation results in discrepancies between the title methods demonstrating a limited applicability of the simplified selection procedure. The most apparent reason for this is dispersion interaction which can significantly influence structure behavior and shift energetic properties of the layered cathode materials at high lithium deintercalation levels.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2018
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.