Issue |
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 211, 2019
WONDER-2018 – 5th International Workshop On Nuclear Data Evaluation for Reactor applications
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 07003 | |
Number of page(s) | 9 | |
Section | Uncertainties And Covariance Matrices (Methodology and Impact on Reactor Calculations) | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201921107003 | |
Published online | 05 June 2019 |
https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201921107003
JEFF-3.3 covariance application to ICSBEP using SANDY and NDAST
OECD/Nuclear Energy Agency, 45 Quai Alphonse le Gallo, Boulogne-Billancourt, 92100, France
* e-mail: luca.fiorito@oecd-nea.org
Published online: 5 June 2019
Providing reliable estimates of the nuclear data contribution to the uncertainty of well-known integral benchmarks is fundamental to the validation and verification process for a nuclear data library. The Nuclear Energy Agency has produced and maintains the NDaST sensitivity tool, which integrates the DICE sensitivities and nuclear data covariances. This system has been used to rigorously and efficiently provide direct feedback to evaluators and streamline validation. For its future evolution and to identify high-priority development areas, NDaST is continuously compared against state-of-the-art codes that use different uncertainty propagation methodologies.
In this work, NDaST was compared to the nuclear data sampling code SANDY for several ICSBEP criticality benchmarks using the JEFF-3.3 evaluated data. Despite excellent overall agreement for cross sections and fission neutron multiplcities, discrepancies due to processed covariance descriptions for angular distributions and prompt fission neutron spectra have identified areas where coordinated development of nuclear data covariance descriptions should be prioritised.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2019
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.