Fusion Hindrance and Pauli Blocking in 58_Ni + 64_Ni

¹ INFN, Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro, Padova, Italy
² University of Padova and INFN, Sez. di, Padova, Italy
³ Ruđer Bošković Institute, Zagreb, Croatia
⁴ Institute of Nuclear Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Cracow, Poland
⁵ PHC, CNRS-IN2P3, Université, de Strasbourg, Strasbourg Cedex 2, France
⁶ Heavy Ion Laboratory, Univ. of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
⁷ Università of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy and INFN, Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro, Padova, Italy

^* e-mail: stefanini@lnl.infn.it

Published online: 4 December 2019

Abstract

⁵⁸Ni +⁶⁴Ni is the first case where the influence of positive Q-value transfer channels on sub-barrier fusion was evidenced, in a very well known experiment by Beckerman et al., by comparing with the two systems ⁵⁸Ni + ⁵⁸Ni and ⁶⁴Ni+⁶⁴Ni. Subsequent measurements on ⁶⁴Ni + ⁶⁴Ni showed that fusion hindrance is clearly present in this case. On the other hand, no indication of hindrance can be observed for ⁵⁸Ni + ⁶⁴Ni down to the measured level of 0.1 mb. In the present experiment the excitation function has been extended by two orders of magnitude downward. The cross sections for ⁵⁸Ni + 64Ni continue decreasing very smoothly below the barrier, down to '1 µb. The logarithmic slope of the excitation function increases slowly, showing a tendency to saturate at the lowest energies. No maximum of the astrophysical S -factor is observed. Coupled-channels (CC) calculations using a Woods-Saxon potential and includinginelastic excitations only, underestimate the sub-barrier cross sections by a large amount. Good agreement is found by adding two-neutron transfer couplings to a schematical level. This behaviour is quite different from what already observed for ⁶⁴Ni+ ⁶⁴Ni (no positive Q-value transfer channels available), where a clear low-energy maximum of the S -factorappears, and whose excitation function is overestimated by a standard Woods-Saxon CC calculation. No hindrance effect is observed in ⁵⁸Ni+ ⁶⁴Ni in the measured energy range. This trend at deep sub-barrier energies reinforces the recent suggestion that the availability of several states following transfer with Q>0, effectively counterbalances the Pauli repulsion that, in general, is predicted to reduce tunneling probability inside the Coulomb barrier.