Issue |
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 245, 2020
24th International Conference on Computing in High Energy and Nuclear Physics (CHEP 2019)
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 06015 | |
Number of page(s) | 6 | |
Section | 6 - Physics Analysis | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202024506015 | |
Published online | 16 November 2020 |
https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202024506015
ML Track Fitting in Nuclear Physics
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility
* e-mail: tbritton@jlab.org
** e-mail: davidl@jlab.org
*** e-mail: gavalian@jlab.org
Published online: 16 November 2020
Charged particle tracking represents the largest consumer of CPU resources in high data volume Nuclear Physics (NP) experiments. An effort is underway to develop machine learning (ML) networks that will reduce the resources required for charged particle tracking. Tracking in NP experiments represent some unique challenges compared to high energy physics (HEP). In particular, track finding typically represents only a small fraction of the overall tracking problem in NP. This presentation will outline the differences and similarities between NP and HEP charged particle tracking and areas where ML learning may provide a benefit. The status of the specific effort taking place at Jefferson Lab will also be shown.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2020
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.