Issue |
EPJ Web of Conf.
Volume 294, 2024
WONDER-2023 - 6th International Workshop On Nuclear Data Evaluation for Reactor applications
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 05002 | |
Number of page(s) | 8 | |
Section | Uncertainties and Covariance Matrices | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202429405002 | |
Published online | 17 April 2024 |
https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202429405002
Producing uncertainties and covariance matrix from intermediate data using a Monte-Carlo method
1 Université de Strasbourg, CNRS, IPHC/DRS UMR 7178, 23 Rue du Loess, F-67037 Strasbourg, France
2 CEA, DES, IRESNE, DER, SPRC, LEPh, F-13108 Saint-Paul-lez-Durance, France
* e-mail: ghenning@iphc.cnrs.fr
Published online: 17 April 2024
The necessary improvement of evaluated nuclear data for nuclear applications development is possible through new and high quality experimental measurements. In particular, improving (n, n’) cross section evaluations for fast neutrons is a goal of interest for new reactor fuel cycles, such as 232Th/233U or 238U/239Pu. Our group at CNRS-IPHC developed an experimental program to measure (n, n’γ) cross section using prompt γ-ray spectroscopy and neutron energy determination by time-of-flight with a focus on reaching the highest achievable level of accuracy. The collected partial cross sections can then be used to infer the total (n, n’) one and contribute to evaluation improvement. The extraction of the exclusive (n, n’γ) cross sections from the recorded data involves using many parameters and processing that may introduce uncertainties and correlations. In that case, the usual method for combining and computing uncertainties based on the perturbation theory can be long and complex. It also makes the calculation of covariance hard and the inclusion of some unusual forms of uncertainty even more difficult. To overcome this issue, we developed a process relying on random sampling methods that processes intermediate analysis data to compute cross sections, uncertainties and covariance. As a benchmark, we used this Monte Carlo method on 232Th, 233U and 238U data and reproduced the central values and uncertainties calculated using the analytical method, while also producing covariance matrices for (n, n’γ) cross sections. For particular cases, the random sampling method is able to produce uncertainties that better reflect the input data, compared to the analytical method.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2024
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.