Issue |
EPJ Web of Conf.
Volume 295, 2024
26th International Conference on Computing in High Energy and Nuclear Physics (CHEP 2023)
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 09026 | |
Number of page(s) | 8 | |
Section | Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202429509026 | |
Published online | 06 May 2024 |
https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202429509026
Simulating Hadronization with Machine Learning
Department of Physics, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221, USA
* e-mail: michael.wilkinson@uc.edu
Published online: 6 May 2024
Hadronization is an important part of physics modeling in Monte Carlo event generators, where quarks and gluons are bound into physically observable hadrons. Today’s generators rely on finely-tuned phenomenological models, such as the Lund string model; while these models have been quite successful overall, there remain phenomenological areas where they do not match data well. A machine-learning-based alternative called MLhad, intended ultimately to be data-trainable, can simulate hadronization by encoding latentspace vectors, trained to be distributed according to a user-defined distribution using the sliced-Wasserstein distance in the loss function, then decoding them. The multiplicities and cumulative kinematic distributions of pions generated with MLhad in this way match those generated using Pythia 8.
While this architecture has been successful, an alternative using normalizing flows is convenient for generating non-pion hadrons and for taking advantage of reweighting techniques to reduce computing time. Combined with new methods for reweighting the output of phenomenological models, this updated architecture should prove convenient for comparing the output of MLhad and of empirical models.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2024
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.