Issue |
EPJ Web of Conf.
Volume 299, 2024
EFM22 – Experimental Fluid Mechanics 2022
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 01018 | |
Number of page(s) | 7 | |
Section | Contributions | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202429901018 | |
Published online | 04 July 2024 |
https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202429901018
Coherent structures detection using the DMD and OPD methods: Differences between the methods and sensitivity to the adjustable parameters
1 Institute of Thermomechanics, Czech Academy of Sciences, Department of Fluid Dynamics, Dolejškova 1402/5, 18200, Praha 8, Czech Republic
2 Charles University, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Department of Atmospheric Physics, Ke Karlovu 3, 12116, Praha 2, Czech Republic
* Corresponding author: klukovaz@it.cas.cz
Published online: 4 July 2024
The turbulent part of the flow within the Atmospheric boundary layer is not necessarily totally random, but it usually reports some structures with inner coherence. These so called coherent structures can be decomposed from measured or modelled spatio-temporal data using mathematical methods as for instance dynamic mode decomposition (DMD) or oscillating pattern decomposition (OPD). These two methods produce complex eigenvectors and eigenvalues revealing cyclic propagation of the structures in space accompaigned with the information about the frequency of the structure’s excitation and decay time of the amplitude’s oscillation. This contribution will show that despite some differences in the DMD and OPD calculation, these methods produce very similar results. In contrary, the results are very sensitive to some parametrs occurring in the algorithm, mainly the number of the POD modes included to the calculation. The fewer POD modes are taken, the smoother topology of the DMD or OPD modes containing fewer but bigger whirls is produced, usually going hand by hand with lower frequencies.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2024
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.