Issue |
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 308, 2024
ISRD 17 – International Symposium on Reactor Dosimetry (Part II)
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 01008 | |
Number of page(s) | 9 | |
Section | Experimental Techniques, Measurements and Monitoring | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202430801008 | |
Published online | 11 November 2024 |
https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202430801008
Alternatives to NIST Cf-252 Iirradiations for Transfer Calibration of S-32 Neutron Monitors
1 Sandia National Laboratories, Radiation Modelling and Metrologi, Albuquerque, NM 87123, USA
2 The University of Texas at Austin, Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory, Austin, TX 78758, USA
* Corresponding author: dwvehar@sandia.gov
Published online: 11 November 2024
Gas-flow proportional counting systems are used by the Radiation Metrology Laboratory (RML) at Sandia National Laboratories for reactor fluence monitoring with the 32S(n,p)32P reaction. Calibration of these systems has traditionally been accomplished by fluence-transfer irradiations at the NIST 252Cf facility. Such calibrations have become increasingly difficult as the NIST 252Cf source decayed to unusable levels. To minimize the risk to the testing programs from an inability to properly calibrate these systems, the RML has developed two alternative calibration techniques: 1) development and implementation of certified 32P sources for activity calibrations and subsequent calculation of neutron fluence, and 2) direct counting of non-certified reactor-irradiated sulfur pellets by liquid scintillation counting to determine 32P activity for the subsequent calibration of gas-flow proportional counters. Preliminary comparisons show that the several calibration methods are capable of overall uncertainties within about 5 percent.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2024
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.