Issue |
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 328, 2025
First International Conference on Engineering and Technology for a Sustainable Future (ICETSF-2025)
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 01023 | |
Number of page(s) | 13 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202532801023 | |
Published online | 18 June 2025 |
https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202532801023
Comparative analysis of machine learning classifiers and deep learning models for categorization of Knee Osteoarthritis
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Medicaps University, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India - 453331
* Amit Khatri : amitkhatri389@gmail.com
Published online: 18 June 2025
Knee Osteoarthritis also known as KOA is a disease in which there is so much pain, stiffness and it also limits the mobility of patient, if not cured at right time it can lead to disablement due to degeneration of articular cartilage in knee joint. Due to limited mobility , its treatment and diagnosis are very challenging, especially when there is lack of devices and technologies for precise identification and tracking of this disease’s progression at right time. There is a very common method known as “Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grading” by which degree of Osteoarthritis is determined. The scale of KL grading ranges from ‘0’ to ‘4’ where 0 is ‘no osteoarthritis’ and 4 is ‘severe osteoarthritis. By using machine learning and deep learning, this work presented a approach that improves the accuracy of classification of KOA and its level diagnosis by using X-ray images. In this research work, feature extraction techniques such Global Average Pooling, Min–Max scaling, Histogram of Oriented Gradients (HOG) along with another technique called Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) applied on Xray dataset. The study evaluates two Machine Learning classifiers which were Support Vector Machine (SVM) and XGBoost which both are optimized through GridSearchCV for hyperparameter tuning and two deep learning models EfficientNetB6 and EfficientNetB7 which both were fine tuned. The proposed approach evaluates the knee X-ray images and assigns them to one of 0, 1, 2, 3, or 4 grades in order to automate KL grading. From the experimental results, it is concluded that the XGBoost classifier performed the best with 97.00 % accuracy.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2025
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.