| Issue |
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 343, 2025
1st International Conference on Advances and Innovations in Mechanical, Aerospace, and Civil Engineering (AIMACE-2025)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 05013 | |
| Number of page(s) | 18 | |
| Section | Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning in Engineering | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202534305013 | |
| Published online | 19 December 2025 | |
https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202534305013
Assessment of Supervised Machine Learning Models for their suitability in Flyrock Type Prediction induced by Mine Blasting
1 Department of Computer Science, Avinashilingam Inst. for Home Science and Higher Education for Women, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu, India
2 Centre of Tropical Geoengineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
3 Centre for Cyber Intelligence Avinashilingam Inst. for Home Science and Higher Education for Women, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu, India
4 RMB Consultant, 2C 183, Kalpataru Hills Ph 2, Thane 400 604 India
5 Sustainable Geostructure and Underground Exploration, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, 86400 Batu Pahat, Johor, Malaysia
* Correspondions author: dzulaika@utm.my
Published online: 19 December 2025
Blasting is an essential operation in mining and construction for breaking hard rock, but it inherently risks the dangerous phenomenon of flyrock, which can cause injury to personnel and damage to nearby infrastructure. Consequently, the accurate prediction of flyrock type (e.g., fractured, mid-wall (MW), or fresh) during mine blasting is critical for safety in construction areas. This study addresses this need by implementing eight different Supervised Machine Learning (SML) models—including Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), and Support Vector Machine (SVM)—to precisely forecast flyrock type based on real-time blasting parameters and rock mass properties. The models were trained and evaluated using a dataset comprising 152 blasting events recorded across three open-pit granite mines in Johor, Malaysia. The performance of the constructed SML models was rigorously assessed using standard validation metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 Score. The results demonstrate the superior predictive capabilities of the ensemble models, with the Decision Tree, Random Forest, and AdaBoost models all achieving 100% accuracy in flyrock type prediction with zero prediction loss, thus providing robust tools for enhancing safety management in quarry and construction operations.
Key words: AdaBoost / Decision Tree / Flyrock Prediction / Mining / Random Forest / Supervised Learning
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2025
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

