| Issue |
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 345, 2026
4th International Conference & Exposition on Materials, Manufacturing and Modelling Techniques (ICE3MT2025)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 01030 | |
| Number of page(s) | 7 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202634501030 | |
| Published online | 07 January 2026 | |
https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202634501030
Comparative analysis of microstructural segmentation techniques on SEM and optical micrographs
Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, 600036, Tamil Nadu, India
* Corresponding author: kharikrishna@student.nitw.ac.in
Published online: 7 January 2026
Since grain morphology, distribution, and interfaces have significant effects on mechanical and functional properties, accurate microstructural characterization is still indispensable to materials research. The segmentation of Al+SiC nanocomposites using backscattered electron SEM images and the segmentation of Al-Zn-Mg powder metallurgy alloys using optical micrographs are compared in this paper. This comparison, rather than reporting material-specific results, attempts to present a broader methodological perspective by trying to distill general insights into how various imaging modalities drive algorithmic choices. These accuracy aspects are not revisited here because both have already shown high accuracy in automated segmentation and grain boundary detection. Rather, focus is on how image modality, preprocessing specifications, segmentation pipelines, and post-processing techniques interact to determine the robustness, flexibility, and possible transferability of automated microstructural analysis workflows.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2026
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

