| Issue |
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 362, 2026
31st International Laser Radar Conference (ILRC 31) Held Together with the 22nd Coherent Laser Radar Conference (CLRC 22)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 16001 | |
| Number of page(s) | 4 | |
| Section | CLRC New Algorithms and Machine Learning for Coherent Lidar Applications | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202636216001 | |
| Published online | 09 April 2026 | |
https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202636216001
Turbulent coherent structures in the atmospheric surface layer: Detection on Doppler lidar observations by supervised machine learning
Laboratory of Physico-Chemistry of the Atmosphere (LPCA), UR 4493, University of Littoral Opal Coast (ULCO), Dunkirk, France.
* This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Published online: 9 April 2026
Abstract
Turbulent structures, particularly coherent ones like streaks, significantly influence turbulent fluxes and the dispersion of pollutants in the surface layer. These structures can be observed directly on the horizontal scans of a Doppler lidar, performed during a 13-month campaign in Dunkirk, France, an industrial city on the North Sea shore. About forty thousand quasi-horizontal scans were recorded, capturing two main types of coherent structures: organized and disorganized streaks (a third category named “others” accounting for the absence of structures). An automated classification method was developed for classifying the large dataset of lidar images. The images were pre-processed, notably for retrieving the turbulent part of the wind [1]. Each image was represented by a vector of features designed to highlight the streak patterns and computed in 3 steps: (1) Gray-level Co-occurrence Matrices, (2) texture parameters such as contrast, homogeneity, correlation, or energy [2], and (3) “curve parameters” [1]. A training set consisting of four hundred scans was built to train supervised learning classification algorithms. The Quadratic Discriminant Analysis classifier has the best performance among the four classification algorithms proved; it classified the training set with a cross-validation error of only 5.2 %. All four classifiers successfully discriminated the categories, with about 61% of the scans classified as coherent structures, including about 31% of organized streaks and 30% of disorganized streaks.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2026
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

