| Issue |
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 364, 2026
XXXI International Conference on Ultra-Relativistic Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions “Quark Matter 2025”
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 04003 | |
| Number of page(s) | 4 | |
| Section | Collective Dynamics & Small Systems | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202636404003 | |
| Published online | 17 April 2026 | |
https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202636404003
What happens in hydrodynamic simulations of heavy-ion collisions when causality is violated?
1 Department of Mathematics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville TN, USA
2 Department of Physics and Astronomy, Vanderbilt University, Nashville TN, USA
3 Instituto de Física, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, Brazil
* e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
** e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
*** e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
**** e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
† e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Published online: 17 April 2026
Abstract
We summarize our recent investigations on how causality violations in Israel-Stewart-type relativistic viscous hydrodynamic simulations can give rise to both analytical and numerical instabilities. The classification of space-time regions into causal and stable ("good"), acausal but stable ("bad"), and acausal and unstable ("ugly") is reviewed. We compare the predictions of the MUSIC hydrodynamic solver with an analytical solution, and demonstrate how the acausality-driven instabilities develop in a simple one-dimensional scenario.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2026
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

