| Issue |
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 377, 2026
15th International Physics Seminar (IPS 2026)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 02010 | |
| Number of page(s) | 9 | |
| Section | Instrumentation and Computational Physics | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202637702010 | |
| Published online | 02 July 2026 | |
https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202637702010
Physics-aware vision instrumentation for stingless bee counting at hive entrance using hybrid edge-cloud object detection
1 Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
2 Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, 13220 Jakarta Timur, Jakarta, Indonesia
3 Departemen of Electrical Engineering, Institut Teknologi Indonesia, 15314 Tangerang Selatan, Banten, Indonesia
4 Department of Chemical Engineering, Politeknik Negeri Bandung, 40559 Bandung Barat, Indonesia
5 Research Center for Smart Mechatronics - National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Indonesia
* Corresponding author: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Published online: 2 July 2026
Abstract
Stingless bee entrance monitoring requires a non-invasive tool to measure colony traffic without disrupting foraging. A hybrid edge-cloud object identification system and physics-aware vision instrumentation framework are used to track stingless bees in this paper. The system uses a Raspberry Pi 4 edge node, Sony IMX296 Global Shutter camera, Only Look Once (YOLO)-based detection, and Observation-Centric Simple Online and Realtime Tracking (OC-SORT) tracking. Because entry activity implies foraging intensity, the traffic count can be a non-invasive proxy for colony health and yield. The edge-side YOLO11 and OC-SORT tracking pipeline found trajectory fragmentation during high-speed ingress. A frame interval of 0.0667 s was achieved using a 15 FPS edge processing rate. Inter-frame displacement may approach 0.333 m for bee motion exceeding 5 ms-1, producing missed detections and identity switching. Thus, a sampling-based tracking failure situation happens when a bee travels more than the tracker's maximum association distance between two processed frames. This illustrates that frame rate, bee velocity, field-of-view scale, detector recall, tracker association tolerance, and biologically meaningful bee counting interpretation all affect bee tracking reliability. Validation using 14 one-minute Geniotrigona thoracica entrance videos showed an average IN counting accuracy of 85.0%, OUT counting accuracy of 66.7%, and total counting accuracy of 76.3% compared with manual video counting.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2026
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

