| Issue |
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 379, 2026
2nd International Conference on Sustainable Materials, Methodologies, Technologies & Applications in Engineering (ICS2MT-2026)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 02003 | |
| Number of page(s) | 10 | |
| Section | Structural and Geotechnical Engineering for Resilient and Sustainable Infrastructure | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202637902003 | |
| Published online | 03 August 2026 | |
https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202637902003
A Comparative Three-Dimensional Numerical Study on Geosynthetic-Encased Stone Column Groups Under Varying Conditions
Department of Civil Engineering, Chandigarh University 140413 Mohali, Punjab, India
* Corresponding author: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Published online: 3 August 2026
Abstract
In the last 40 years, ordinary stone columns (OSCs) have gained popularity in improving soft cohesive soils, specifically in providing support to lightly and moderately loaded structures. However, such methods are not very useful for extremely soft soils. To overcome this limitation, geosynthetic-encased stone columns (GESCs) have been developed recently to enhance the performance in very soft soil. The present research paper deals with a comprehensive numerical analysis of full scale GESCs in soft clay installed in groups, performed in PLAXIS 3D software. The analysis investigates variable parameters of GESCs; column diameter (dc), geosynthetic stiffness, column length (Lc), encasement length (Le), undrained shear strength (cu) and angle of internal friction (ϕ) of the stone column material. The Mohr Coulomb model failure criterion was applied on clayey soil and stone columns. The performance of GESCs was evaluated in the terms of ultimate bearing capacity (UBC) and settlement reduction through load settlement plots. A geosynthetic encasement over ordinary stone columns has shown a notable increase in the ultimate bearing capacity. With reference to case floating GESCs, the gain in UBC was 67% and that for end-bearing GESCs was 164% when compared to the clay bed. The results indicate that increased column diameter reduced significant settlement by 40% in the case of OSCs.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2026
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

