| Issue |
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 380, 2026
International Conference on Information Systems and Communication Technologies (ICISCT’25)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 01008 | |
| Number of page(s) | 9 | |
| Section | Microwave Components and 5G/6G Communication Systems | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202638001008 | |
| Published online | 03 August 2026 | |
https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202638001008
Comparative Analysis of Neural Network Architectures for Digital Predistortion in Power Amplifier Linearization
1 National Institute of Postes and Telecomunications (INPT) Rabat, Morocco
2 Centre regional des métiers de l’éducation et de formation (CRMEF) Casablanca, Morocco
3 Universidad de Cantabria (UNICAN), Santander, Spain
* e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
** e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
*** e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
**** e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
† e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
‡ e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Published online: 3 August 2026
Abstract
In this study, we examine and contrast the effectiveness of different artificial neural network (ANN) topologies for power amplifier (PA) digital pre-distortion (DPD). In particular, we investigate long short-term memory (LSTM) networks, gated recurrent units (GRU), recurrent neural networks (RNN), con-volutional neural networks (CNN), and fully connected neural networks (DNN). For training and assessment, a dataset comprising measured input and output signals from a commercial NXP Doherty PA working in the 3.6–3.8 GHz region with a 16-QAM OFDM signal is utilised. Normalised mean squared error (NMSE), adjacent channel power ratio (ACPR), and model complexity are used to evaluate the models. Simulation results show that while CNNs offer a favorable trade-off between linearization performance and model complexity, GRU and LSTM architectures achieve the best overall NMSE and ACPR improvements, albeit with a higher number of parameters. Power spectral density and AM/AM characteristic analyses further confirm the superior linearization performance achieved using recurrent gated structures.
Key words: Digital predistortion (DPD) / Power amplifier linearization / Neural Network / FFNN / CNN / RNN / GRU / LSTM
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2026
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

