| Issue |
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 380, 2026
International Conference on Information Systems and Communication Technologies (ICISCT’25)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 02005 | |
| Number of page(s) | 13 | |
| Section | Artificial Intelligence, Advanced Control Systems, and Energy Management | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202638002005 | |
| Published online | 03 August 2026 | |
https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202638002005
Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning for Sustainable Manufacturing with Integrated Microgrid: Benchmarking SAC and PPO
National Institute of Posts and Telecommunications (INPT), Rabat, Morocco
* e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
** e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
*** e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Published online: 3 August 2026
Abstract
Running a manufacturing line alongside an on-site renewable micro-grid couples two decisions that used to be handled separately: when to run the machines, and how to manage local generation and storage. Both must be settled in real time, and each controller sees only a noisy local part of the plant. We cast the problem as a decentralized partially observable Markov decision process (Dec-POMDP) with five cooperating agents, namely two production machines, a wind turbine, a battery bank, and a backup generator. On this testbed we compare two actor-critic algorithms that treat exploration in opposite ways: Soft Actor-Critic (SAC), which is entropy-regularized, and Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO), which keeps each update inside a clipped trust region. Over 10,000 training episodes SAC earns a 15.6% higher mean episode reward (5990.65 against 5181.75), which we attribute to wider exploration of the joint state space, while PPO produces a 22% tighter reward spread (standard deviation 24.86 against 31.89). The learned storage policies differ as well: PPO cycles the battery across almost the full admissible 10%–90% state-of-charge (SOC) window, whereas SAC holds a narrow 25%–60% band. We discuss what these differences imply for battery wear and scheduling stability, check the results against published baselines and through cross-algorithm agreement, and turn the findings into practical algorithm-selection guidance for industrial operators.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2026
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

