Open Access
EPJ Web of Conferences
Volume 24, 2012
Environmental Radioactivity 2010
Article Number 01001
Number of page(s) 15
Section Frontiers in Science
Published online 04 April 2012
  1. ICRP Protection of Non-human Species from Ionising Radiation. Proposal for a Framework for the assessment of ionising radiation in the environment. Annals of the ICRP, Publication 91 Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK (2003). [Google Scholar]
  2. ICRP Environmental protection: the concept and use of reference animals and plants. Annals of ICRP, Publication 108 Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (2008); 242 pages. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bréchignac F. Protection of the environment: how to position radio-protection in an ecological risk assessment perspective. The Science of the Total Environment, 307 (2003); 37–54. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bréchignac F., Doi M. Challenging the current strategy of radiological protection of the environment: arguments for an ecosystem approach. J. Environ. Radioact. 100 (2009); 1125–1134. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Jørgensen S. E. Towards a thermodynamics of biological systems. Int. J. Ecodyn. 1 (2006); 9–27. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kay J. J. Ecosystems as self-organising holarchic open systems: narratives and the second law of thermodynamics. In: Handbook of ecosystem theories and management, edited by Joergensen S. E., Müller F. CRC Press, Lewis Publishers (2000); pp. 135–160. [Google Scholar]
  7. Müller F., Hoffmann-Kroll R., Wiggering H. Indicating ecosystem integrity - Theoretical concepts and environmental requirements. Ecological Modelling 130 (2000); 13–23. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cambel A. B. Applied chaos theory: A paradigm for complexity. Academic press, Inc., Boston, MA, USA (1993). [Google Scholar]
  9. Landis W., Yu M-H. Introduction to environmental Toxicology - Impacts of chemicals upon ecological systems Lewis Publishers, CRC Press, Boca Raton, London, New York, Washington D.C. (2004); 484 pages. [Google Scholar]
  10. Barnthouse L. W., Munns W. R., Sorensen M. T. Population-level Ecological Risk Assessment. Society of Environmental Toxicity and Chemistry, CRC Press (2007); 337 pages. [Google Scholar]
  11. Roughgarden J. Theory of population genetics and evolutionary ecology: an introduction Prentice-Hall Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA (1996). [Google Scholar]
  12. Bothwell M. L., Sherbot D. M. J., Pollock CM. Ecosystem response to solar ultraviolet-B radiation: Influence of trophic-level interactions. Science 265 (1994); 97–100. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Fuma S., Ishii N., Takeda H., Miyamoto K., Yanagisawa K., Ishimasa Y., Saito M., Kawabata Z., Polikarpov G. G. Ecological effects of various toxic agents on the aquatic microcosm in comparison with acute ionising radiation. J. Environ. Radioact. 67 (2003); 1–14. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Doi M., Kawagushi I., Tanaka N., Fuma S., Ishii N., Miyamoto K., Takeda H., Kawabata Z. Model ecosystem approach to estimate community level effects of radiation. Radioprot. Suppl. 1, 40 (2005); S913–S919. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  15. Sokolov V. E., Krivolutsky D. A. Change in ecology and biodiversity after a nuclear disaster in the southern Urals. Pensoft Publishers, Sofia, Moscow (1998); 228 pages. [Google Scholar]
  16. Massarin S., Alonzo F., Garcia-Sanchez L., Gilbin R., Garnier-Laplace J., Poggiale J. C. Effects of chronic uranium exposure on life history and physiology of Daphnia magna over three successive generations. Aquatic Toxicology 99 (2010); 309–319. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Folke C., Carpenter S., Walker B., Scheffer M., Elmquist T., Gunderson L., Holling C. S. Regime shifts, resilience, and biodiversity in ecosystem management. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 35 (2004); 557–581. [Google Scholar]
  18. Bréchignac F. Environment versus man radioprotection: the need for a new conceptual approach ? Radioprotection 37-C1 (2002); 161–166. [Google Scholar]
  19. Crober A. An annotated bibliography on the ecosystem approach to ecosystem management. Senior Honous Thesis, Department of Geography, Faculty of Environmental Studies, University of Waterloo, Canada (1999). Available from: [Google Scholar]
  20. Convention on Biological Diversity. Ecosystem approach (2004) COP 5 Decision V/6. [Google Scholar]
  21. FAO Food and Agriculture Organisation. Fisheries management. 2. The ecosystem approach to fisheries FAO Fisheries Technical Guidelines n° 4, Suppl. 2 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  22. Laffoley D. d’A., Maltby E., Vincent M. A., Mee L., Dunn E., Gilliland P., Mortimeer D., Pound D. The ecosystem approach. Coherent actions for marine and coastal environments. A report to the UK Government. English Nature, Peterborough (2004); 65 pages. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.