Open Access
EPJ Web of Conferences
Volume 26, 2012
DYMAT 2012 - 10th International Conference on the Mechanical and Physical Behaviour of Materials under Dynamic Loading
Article Number 01039
Number of page(s) 6
Section Experimental Techniques
Published online 31 August 2012
  1. P. Pardo, Co-moulding of twintex continuous reinforcement, Technical presentation on Thermoplastic Composites Infrastructure Cooperation Network (2004), [Google Scholar]
  2. EireComposites (2011), [Google Scholar]
  3. W. Hufenbach, A. Hornig, B. Zhou, A. Langkamp, M. Gude, Compos. Sci. Technol. 71, 1110 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. R. Govender, Ph.D. thesis, University of Cape Town (2011) [Google Scholar]
  5. K. Brown, R. Brooks, N. Warrior, Compos. Sci. Technol. 70, 272 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Owens-Corning-Vetrotex Reinforcements, Twintex T PP data sheet (2008) [Google Scholar]
  7. T. Cloete, A. van der Westhuizen, S. Kok, G. Nurick, A tapered striker pulse shaping technique for uniform strain rate dynamic compression of bovine bone, in DYMAT 2009 - 9th International Conference on the Mechanical and Physical Behaviour of Materials Under Dynamic Loading (pubnameEDP Sciences, 2009), pp. 901–907, [Google Scholar]
  8. R. Govender, L. Louca, A. Fallah, A. Pullen, G. Nurick, J. Compos. Mater. In press (2012) [Google Scholar]
  9. G. Gray III, Mechanical Testing and Evaluation (ASM International, 1999), Vol. 8 of ASM Handbook, chap. Classic Split-Hopkinson Pressure Bar Testing [Google Scholar]
  10. W. Chen, B. Song, Split Hopkinson (Kolsky) Bar (Springer, 2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. P. Follansbee, C. Frantz, J. Eng. Mat. Tech 105, 61 (1983) [Google Scholar]
  12. D. Gorham, J. Phys. E. Sci. Intrum. 16, 477 (1983) [Google Scholar]
  13. D. Gorham, Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser. 47, 16 (1979) [Google Scholar]
  14. D. Gorham, P. Pope, J. Field, Proc. R. Roc. Lond. A8, 153 (1992) [Google Scholar]
  15. J. Lifshitz, H. Leber, Int. J. Impact Engng 15, 723 (1994) [Google Scholar]
  16. L. Yang, V. Shim, Int. J. Impact Engng 31, 129 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  17. M. Tarfaoui, S. Choukri, A. Neme, Compos. Sci. Technol. 68, 477 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. B. Gama, J. Gillespie Jr, H. Mahfuz, R. Raines, A. Haque, S. Jeelani, T. Bogetti, B. Fink, J. Compos. Mat. 35, 1201 (2001) [Google Scholar]
  19. I. Daniel, B. Werner, J. Fenner, Compos. Sci. Technol. 71, 357 (2011) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.