Open Access
EPJ Web of Conferences
Volume 27, 2012
2nd Workshop on Neutron Cross Section Covariances
Article Number 00007
Number of page(s) 6
Published online 30 May 2012
  1. W.P. Poenitz, S.E. Aumeier, Report ANL/NDM-139 (Argonne National Laboratory, 1997) [Google Scholar]
  2. T. Kawano, H. Matsunobu, T. Murata, A. Zukeran, Y. Nakajima, M. Kawai, O. Iwamoto, K. Shibata, T. Nakagawa, T. Ohsawa, M. Baba, T. Yoshida, Report JAERI-Research 2000-004 (Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute, 2000) [Google Scholar]
  3. R. Capote, D.L. Smith, A. Trkov, EPJ Web of Conf. 8, (2010) 04001, and references therein [Google Scholar]
  4. N. Otuka, S. Dunaeva, E. Dupont, O. Schwerer, A. Blokhin, J. Korean Phys. Soc. 59 No. 2, (2011) 1292, and references therein [Google Scholar]
  5. N. Otuka, S. Dunaeva (ed.), Report INDC(NDS)-401 (Rev.5) (International Atomic Energy Agency, 2010) [Google Scholar]
  6. F.G. Perey, Proc. Int. Conf. on Neutron Physics and Nuclear Data for Reactors and Other Applied Purposes (Harwell CONF-780921, 1978) 104 [Google Scholar]
  7. G.D. James, Proc. Int. Symp. on Neutron Standards and Applications (NBS Special Publication 493, 1977) 319 [Google Scholar]
  8. Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology (JCGM), Evaluation of measurement data – Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM) – JCGM 100:2008 (2008) [Google Scholar]
  9. W. Mannhart, Report INDC(NDS)-0588 (International Atomic Energy Agency, 2011) [Google Scholar]
  10. D.L. Smith, Probability, statistics and data uncertainties in nuclear science and technology (American Nuclear Society, La Grange Park, IL, USA 1991) [Google Scholar]
  11. A. Trkov, D.L. Smith, R. Capote, Report INDC(NDS)-0582 (International Atomic Energy Agency, 2011) [Google Scholar]
  12. N. Otsuka (ed.), Report IAEA-NDS-207 Rev.2011/01 (International Atomic Energy Agency, 2011) [Google Scholar]
  13. D.L. Smith, N. Otuka, Nucl. Data Sheets (to be published in 2012) [Google Scholar]
  14. G.J. Wyant, A.M. Daly (ed.), Report INDC(NDS) 125 (International Atomic Energy Agency, 1981) [Google Scholar]
  15. M. Lammer, O. Schwerer (ed.), Report INDC(NDS)– 141 (International Atomic Energy Agency, 1982) [Google Scholar]
  16. D.L. Smith, J.W. Meadows, I. Kanno, Report ANL/NDM-85 (Argonne National Laboratory, 1984); EXFOR 12904 [Google Scholar]
  17. C. Sage, Mesures des sections efficaces totale et (n,2n) sur 241Am (Université de Strasbourg, 2009) [Google Scholar]
  18. G. Winkler, D.L. Smith, J.W. Meadows, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 76, (1980) 30; EXFOR 10921 [Google Scholar]
  19. P. Guenther, D.L. Smith, A.B. Smith, J.F. Whalen, Nucl. Phys. A448, (1986) 280; EXFOR 12869 [Google Scholar]
  20. N. Otsuka (ed.), Report INDC(NDS)-0593 (International Atomic Energy Agency, 2011) [Google Scholar]
  21. C. Sage, V. Semkova, O. Bouland, P. Dessagne, A. Fernandez, F. Gunsig, C. Naestren, G. Noguere, H. Ottmar, A.J.M. Plompen, P. Romain, G. Rudolf, J. Somers, F. Wastin, Phys. Rev. C 81, (2010) 064604; EXFOR 23114 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. C. Bastian, Proc. Int. Symposium on Nuclear Data Evaluation Methodology, Brookhaven National Laboratory, USA (1992) 642 [Google Scholar]
  23. C. Bastian, Proc. Int. Conf. on Neutron Research and Industry, Creta, Greece (1996) 611 [Google Scholar]
  24. C. Bastian, A. Borella, F. Gunsing, J. Heyse, S. Kopecky, G. Noguere, P. Siegler, P. Schillebeeckx, Proc. Advances in Nuclear Analysis and Simulation, PHYSOR-2006, Vancouver, Canada (2006) C013 [Google Scholar]
  25. N. Otuka, A. Borella, S. Kopecky, C. Lampoudis, P. Schillebeeckx, J. Korean Phys. Soc. 59 No. 2, (2011) 1314 [Google Scholar]
  26. S. Kopecky, I. Ivanov, M. Moxon, P. Schillebeeckx, P. Siegler, I. Sirakov, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B267, (2009) 2345; EXFOR 23077 [Google Scholar]
  27. V. Zerkin (these proceedings) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.