Open Access
EPJ Web of Conferences
Volume 42, 2013
WONDER-2012 – 3rd International Workshop On Nuclear Data Evaluation for Reactor applications
Article Number 03003
Number of page(s) 5
Section Uncertainties and Covariance Matrices
Published online 18 March 2013
  1. A. Santamarina, et al, “The JEFF – 3.1.1 Nuclear Data Library, JEFF Report” 22, NEA No. 6807 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  2. M. Herman, “Development of ENDF/B-VII.1 and Its Covariance Components”, Journal of the Korean Physical Society, 59, pp.1034–1039 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  3. K. Shibata et al., “JENDL-4.0: A New Library for Innovative Nuclear Energy Systems,” Journal of the Korean Physical Society, 59, pp.1046–1051 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  4. “SCALE: A Modular Code System for Performing Standardized Computer Analyses for Licensing Evaluation, Version 6”, ORNL/TM-2005/39 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  5. B.T. Rearden and D.E. Mueller, “Uncertainty Quantification Techniques of SCALE/ TSUNAMI”, Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 104, pp.371–373 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  6. I. Kodeli, “The SUSD3D Code for Cross-Section Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis – Recent Development,” Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 104, pp.791–793 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  7. N. García-Herranz, O. Cabellos, J. Sanz, J. Juan, and J. C. Kuijper, “Propagation of Statistical and Nuclear Data Uncertainties in Monte Carlo Burnup Calculations,” Annals of Nucl. Energy, 35, pp.714–730 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  8. O. Buss, A. Hoefer, and J.C. Neuber, “NUDUNA – Nuclear Data Uncertainty Analysis,” Proc. International Conference on Nuclear Criticality (ICNC 2011), Edinburgh, Scotland, Sep. 19–22, 2011, on CD-ROM (2011). [Google Scholar]
  9. A. J. Koning and D. Rochman, “Towards Sustainable Nuclear Energy: Putting Nuclear Physics to Work,” Annals of Nucl. Energy, 35, pp.2024–2030 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  10. W. Zwermann, B. Krzykacz-Hausmann, L. Gallner, A. Pautz, “Influence of Nuclear Covariance Data on Reactor Core Calculations,” Second International Workshop on Nuclear Data Evaluation for Reactor Applications (WONDER 2009), Cadarache, France, 29 Sep. – 2 Oct., 2009, pp.99–104 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  11. B. Krzykacz, E. Hofer, M. Kloos, “A Software System for Probabilistic Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis of Results from Computer Models,” Proc. International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management (PSAM-II), San Diego, Ca., USA, (1994). [Google Scholar]
  12. “International Handbook of Evaluated Criticality Safety Benchmark Experiments”, September 2010 Edition, available on DVD-ROM, NEA/NSC/DOC(95)03. [Google Scholar]
  13. “International Handbook of Evaluated Reactor Physics Benchmark Experiments”, March 2010 Edition, available on DVD-ROM, NEA/NSC/DOC (2006)1. [Google Scholar]
  14. T. Kozlowski, T. J. Downar, “The PWR MOX/UO2 Core Transient Benchmark, Final Report”, NEA/NSC/DOC(2006)20. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.