Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web of Conferences
Volume 49, 2013
HCP 2012 – Hadron Collider Physics Symposium 2012
Article Number 03002
Number of page(s) 6
Section Heavy-Flavor session
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/20134903002
Published online 20 May 2013
  1. O. Callot, LHCb detector status and upgrade, these proceedings. [Google Scholar]
  2. N. Cabibbo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 10 (1963) 531. [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Kobayashi and T. Maskawa, Prog. Theor. Phys. 49 (1973) 652. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. CKMfitter group, J. Charles et al., Eur. Phys. J. C41 (2005) 028, arXiv: hep-ph/0406184. Numbers from: http://ckmfitter.in2p3.fr/www/results/plots_moriond12. [Google Scholar]
  5. UTfit collaboration, M. Bona et al., JHEP 507 (2005) 1, arXiv: hep-ph/0501199. Numbers taken from: http://www.utfit.org/UTfit/ResultsSummer2012PreICHEP. [Google Scholar]
  6. M. Gronau and D. London, Phys. Lett. B253 (1991) 483. [Google Scholar]
  7. M. Gronau and D. Wyler, Phys. Lett. B265 (1991) 172. [Google Scholar]
  8. D. Atwood, I. Dunietz, and A. Soni, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 (1997) 3257, arXiv: hep-ph/9612433. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. D. Atwood, I. Dunietz, and A. Soni, Phys. Rev. D63 (2001) 036005, arXiv: hep-ph/0008090. [Google Scholar]
  10. A. Giri, Y. Grossman, A. Soffer, and J. Zupan, Phys. Rev. D68 (2003) 054018, arXiv: hep-ph/0303187. [Google Scholar]
  11. BaBar collaboration, B. Aubert et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 121802, arXiv: hep-ex/0504039. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. BaBar collaboration, B. Aubert et al., Phys. Rev. D78 (2008) 034023, arXiv:0804.2089. [Google Scholar]
  13. BaBar collaboration, P. del Amo Sanchez et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 (2010) 121801, arXiv:1005.1096. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Belle collaboration, A. Poluektov et al., Phys. Rev. D70 (2004) 072003, arXiv: hep-ex/0406067. [Google Scholar]
  15. Belle collaboration, A. Poluektov et al., Phys. Rev. D73 (2006) 112009, arXiv: hep-ex/0604054. [Google Scholar]
  16. Belle collaboration, A. Poluektov et al., Phys. Rev. D81 (2010) 112002, arXiv:1003.3360. [Google Scholar]
  17. CLEO collaboration, J. Libby et al., Phys. Rev. D82 (2010) 112006, arXiv:1010.2817. [Google Scholar]
  18. A. Bondar and A. Poluektov, Eur. Phys. J. C47 (2006) 347, arXiv: hep-ph/0510246. [Google Scholar]
  19. Heavy Flavor Averaging Group, D. Asner et al., arXiv:1010.1589, updates available online at http://www.slac.stanford.edu/xorg/hfag. [Google Scholar]
  20. LHCb collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Phys. Lett. B712 (2012) 203, arXiv:1203.3662. [Google Scholar]
  21. Particle Data Group, Beringer, J. et al., Phys. Rev. D86 (2012) 010001. [Google Scholar]
  22. LHCb collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Phys. Lett. B718 (2012) 43, arXiv:1209.5869. [Google Scholar]
  23. LHCb collaboration, R. Aaij et al., LHCb-CONF-2012-030 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  24. CLEO collaboration, N. Lowrey et al., Phys. Rev. D80 (2009) 031105, arXiv:0903.4853. [Google Scholar]
  25. BaBar collaboration, Aubert, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (2008) 061803, arXiv:0709.2715. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Belle collaboration, M. Staric et al., Phys. Lett. B670 (2008) 190, arXiv:0807.0148. [Google Scholar]
  27. LHCb collabortion, R. Aaij et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 111602, arXiv:1112.0938. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. CDF collabortion, T. Aaltonen et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012) 111801, arXiv:1207.2158. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Heavy Flavor Averaging Group, Y. Amhis et al., arXiv:1207.1158, updates available online at http://www.slac.stanford.edu/xorg/hfag. [Google Scholar]
  30. LHCb collaboration, R. Aaij et al., LHCb-CONF-2012-032 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  31. A. J. Buras et al., Eur. Phys. J. C72 (2012) 2172, arXiv:1208.0934. [Google Scholar]
  32. K. de Bruyn et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012) 041801, arXiv:1204.1737. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. LHCb collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 231801, arXiv:1203.4493. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. LHCb collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 021801, arXiv:1211.2674. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. T. Feldmann amd J.Matias, JHEP 0301 (2003) 0301, arXiv: hep-ph/0212158. [Google Scholar]
  36. LHCb collaboration, R. Aaij et al., JHEP 07 (2012) 133, arXiv:1205.3422. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Belle collaboration, J.-T. Wei et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 (2009) 171801, arXiv:0904.0770. [Google Scholar]
  38. BaBar collaboration, J.P. Lees et al., submitted to Phys. Rev. D, arXiv:1204.3933. [Google Scholar]
  39. CDF collaboration, T. Aaltonen et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 201802, arXiv:1107.3753. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. K. Lande et al., Phys. Rev. bf 103 (1956) 1901. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. ARGUS collaboration, H. Albrecht et al., Phys. Lett. B 192 (1987) 245. [Google Scholar]
  42. CDF collaboration, A. Abulencia et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 (2006) 242003, arXiv: hep-ex/0609040. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. BaBar collaboration, B. Aubert et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2007) 211802, arXiv: hep-ex/0703020. [Google Scholar]
  44. Belle collaboration, M. Staric et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2007) 211803, arXiv: hep-ex/0703036. [Google Scholar]
  45. CDF collaboration, T. Aaltonen et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (2008) 121802, arXiv:0712.1567. [Google Scholar]
  46. BaBar collaboration, B. Aubert et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 (2009) 211801, arXiv:0807.4544. [Google Scholar]
  47. BaBar collaboration, B. Aubert et al., Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 071103, arXiv:0908.0761. [Google Scholar]
  48. LHCb collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Phys. Lett. B712 (2012) 203, arXiv:1211.1230. [Google Scholar]
  49. Belle collaboration, L.M. Zhang et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 151801, arXiv: hep-ex/0601029. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.