EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 57 (2013) EPJ Web of Conferences, 57 (2013) 03005 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web of Conferences
Volume 57, 2013
ICAP 2012 – 23rd International Conference on Atomic Physics
Article Number 03005
Number of page(s) 8
Section Quantum optics and cavity QED
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/20135703005
Published online 30 August 2013
  1. H J Carmichael. Statistical Methods in Quantum Optics 1: Master Equations and Fokker-Planck Equations. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  2. H. J. Carmichael. Statistical Methods in Quantum Optics 2: Non-Classical Fields. Springer, Berlin, 2008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. H M Wiseman and G J Milburn. Quantum Measurement and Control. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  4. D G Norris, L A Orozco, P Barberis-Blostein, and H J Carmichael. Observation of ground-state quantum beats in atomic spontaneous emission. Phys. Rev. Lett., 105:123602, 2010. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. D. G. Norris, A. D. Cimmarusti, L. A. Orozco, P. Barberis-Blostein, and H. J. Carmichael. Spontaneous creation and persistence of ground-state coherence in a resonantly driven intra-cavity atomic ensemble. Submitted. [Google Scholar]
  6. D. G. Norris, A. D. Cimmarusti, L. A. Orozco, P. Barberis-Blostein, and H. J. Carmichael. Anomalous light shift through quantum jumps in quasiresonant rayleigh scattering. Phys. Rev. A, 85:021804, 2012. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ivan H. Deutsch and Poul S. Jessen. Quantum control and measurement of atomic spins in polarization spectroscopy. Optics Communications, 283:681, 2010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. P Barberis-Blostein, D G Norris, L A Orozco, and H J Carmichael. From quantum feedback to probabilistic error correction: Manipulation of quantum beats in cavity QED. New J. Phys., 12:023002, 2010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. D. G. Norris, A. D. Cimmarusti, and L. A. Orozco. Conditional control of quanum beats in a cavity. J. Phys. Conf. Series, 274:012143, 2011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. W P Smith, J E Reiner, L A Orozco, S Kuhr, and H M Wiseman. Capture and release of a conditional state of a cavity QED system by quantum feedback. Phys. Rev. Lett., 89:133601, 2002. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. J E Reiner, W P Smith, L A Orozco, H M Wiseman, and J Gambetta. Quantum feedback in a weakly driven cavity qed system. Phys. Rev. A, 70:0238119, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  12. Clement Sayrin, Igor Dotsenko, Xingxing Zhou, Bruno Peaudecerf, Theo Rybarczyk, Sebastien Gleyzes, Pierre Rouchon, Mazyar Mirrahimi, Hadis Amini, Michel Brune, Jean-Michel Raimond, and Serge Haroche. Real-time quantum feedback prepares and stabilizes photon number states. Nature, 477(7362):73–77, 2011. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. X. Zhou, I. Dotsenko, B. Peaudecerf, T. Rybarczyk, C. Sayrin, S. Gleyzes, J. M. Raimond, M. Brune, and S. Haroche. Field locked to a fock state by quantum feedback with single photon corrections. Phys. Rev. Lett., 108:243602, 2012. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Greg A. Smith, Andrew Silberfarb, Ivan H. Deutsch, and Poul S. Jessen. Efficient quantum-state estimation by continuous weak measurement and dynamical control. Phys. Rev. Lett., 97:180403, 2006. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Seth T. Merkel, Poul S. Jessen, and Ivan H. Deutsch. Quantum control of the hyperfine-coupled electron and nuclear spins in alkali-metal atoms. Phys. Rev. A, 78:023404, 2008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Brian E. Mischuck, Seth T. Merkel, and Ivan H. Deutsch. Control of inhomogeneous atomic ensembles of hyperfine qudits. Phys. Rev. A, 85:022302, 2012. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. D G Norris, E J Cahoon, and L A Orozco. Atom detection in a two-mode optical cavity with intermediate coupling: Autocorrelation studies. Phys. Rev. A, 80:043830, 2009. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Z T Lu, K L Corwin, M J Renn, M H Anderson, E A Cornell, and C E Wieman. Low-velocity intense source of atoms from a magneto-optical trap. Phys. Rev. Lett., 77:3331, 1996. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. A D Cimmarusti, C A Schroeder, B D Patterson, L A Orozco, P Barberis-Blostein, and H J Carmichael. Control of conditional quantum beats in cavity QED: amplitude decoherence and phase shifts. Submitted, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  20. A G Zajonc. Proposed quantum-beats, quantum-eraser experiment. Phys. Lett. A, 96:61, 1983. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. A Aspect, J Dalibard, P Grangier, and G Roger. Quantum beats in continuously excited atomic cascades. Opt. Commun., 49:429, 1984. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. E B Alexandrov, M P Chaika, and G I Khvostenko. Interference of Atomic States. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1993. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. H J Carmichael. An Open Systems Approach to Quantum Optics, Lecture Notes in Physics, volume 18. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  24. H Uys, M J Biercuk, A P VanDevender, C Ospelkaus, D Meise, R Ozeri, and J J Bollinger. Decoherence due to elastic rayleigh scattering. Phys. Rev. Lett., 105:200401, 2010. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. C Cohen-Tannoudji. Théorie quantique du cycle de pompage optique. Vérification expérimentale des nuveaux effets prévus. Ann. Phys. (Paris), 13e série, 7:423–495, 1962. [Google Scholar]
  26. M B Plenio and P L Knight. The quantum-jump approach to dissipative dynamics in quantum optics. Rev. Mod. Phys., 70:101, 1998. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.