Open Access
EPJ Web of Conferences
Volume 70, 2014
1st International Conference on New Frontiers in Physics
Article Number 00062
Number of page(s) 12
Section Thursday
Published online 10 April 2014
  1. M. Tigner, Nuovo Cim. 37 (1965) 1228.
  2. R. B. Palmer, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 40 (1990) 529. [CrossRef]
  3. R. D. Heuer et al., Parameters for the Linear Collider, 2003,, updated 2006,
  4. Jean-Eudes Augustin et al. [International Technology Recommendation Panel], ITRP Recommendation, unpublished report (2004),
  5. TESLA: The superconducting electron positron linear collider with an integrated X-ray laser laboratory. Technical design report, Parts 1-6, DESY-2001-011 (2001).
  6. International Linear Collider Reference Design Report. Volume 1: Executive Summary, ICFA Beam Dyn. Newslett. 42 (2007) 7 [arXiv:0712.1950 [physics.acc-ph]];
  7. Volume 2: Physics at the ILC, arXiv:0709.1893 [hep-ph];
  8. Volume 3: Accelerator, arXiv:0712.2361 [physics.acc-ph];
  9. Volume 4: Detectors, arXiv:0712.2356 [physics.ins-det].
  10. E. Elsen et al., International Linear Collider (ILC): A technical progress report, ANL-11-09 (2011).
  11. ILC Technical Design Documentation,
  12. G. Aad et al. [ATLAS Collaboration], Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 1. [CrossRef]
  13. S. Chatrchyan et al. [CMS Collaboration], Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 30. [CrossRef]
  14. J. E. Brau et al. (eds.), International Linear Collider Physics and detectors: 2011 Status Report, CERN-LCD-NOTE-2011-038 (2011).
  15. J. E. Brau et al., The physics case for an e+e linear collider, arXiv:1210.0202 [hep-ex](2012).
  16. H. Aihara et al. [SiD Concept Group], SiD Letter of Intent, arXiv:0911.0006 [physics.ins-det] (2009).
  17. M. E. Peskin, Comparison of LHC and ILC capabilities for Higgs boson coupling measurements, arXiv:1207.2516 [hep-ph] (2012).
  18. S. Heinemeyer et al. (eds), Implications of LHC results for TeV-scale physics: signals of electroweak symmetry breaking, Submitted to the Open Symposium of the European Strategy Preparatory Group, 2012,
  19. F. Simon, Top physics at CLIC, Talk at LCWS’12, Arlington, TX, 2012, http://ilcagenda.linearcollider. org/
  20. R. Cavanaugh et al. (eds.), Implications of LHC results for TeV-scale physics: new physics with missing energy signatures, Submitted to the Open Symposium of the European Strategy Preparatory Group, 2012,
  21. G. Alexander et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (2008) 210801. [CrossRef]
  22. M. A. Palmer et al. (eds), The CESR Test Accelerator Electron Cloud Research Program Phase I Report, 2012,
  23. T. Abe et al. [ILD Concept Group], The International Large Detector: Letter of Intent, arXiv:1006.3396 [hep-ex] (2010).
  24. Calice collaboration, home page: https:/
  25. M. A. Thomson, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 611 (2009) 25. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  26. C. Adlo et al. [CALICE Collaboration], JINST 6 (2011) P07005.
  27. C. Damerell et al., ILC vertex detector R&D report of review committee, ILC-REPORT-2008-016 (2008).
  28. S. Asai et al., The Final Report of the Subcommittee on Future Projects of High Energy Physics, 2012,
  29. The Japan Association of High Energy Physicists, A Proposal for a Phased Execution of the International Linear Collider Project, 2012,

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.