Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web of Conferences
Volume 71, 2014
2nd International Conference on New Frontiers in Physics
Article Number 00042
Number of page(s) 8
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/20147100042
Published online 29 April 2014
  1. CMS Collaboration, “Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC”, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 30, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.021, arXiv:1207.7235. [Google Scholar]
  2. ATLAS Collaboration, “Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC”, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 1, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.020, arXiv:1207.7214. [Google Scholar]
  3. J. L. Feng, “Dark Matter Candidates from Particle Physics and Methods of Detection”, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 48 (2010) 495, doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101659, arXiv:1003.0904. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. S. Chatrchyan et al. [CMS Collaboration], “The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC”, JINST 3:S08004, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  5. CMS Collaboration, “Search for New Physics in the Multijets and Missing Momentum Final State in Proton-Protn Collisions at √s = 8 TeV”, CERN Document Server CMS-PAS-SUS-13-012, https://cds.cern.ch/record/1563156 [Google Scholar]
  6. CMS Collaboration, “Search for electroweak producti of charginos, neutralions, and sleptons using leptonic final states in pp collisions at √s = 8 TeV”, CERN Document Server CMS-PASSUS-13-017, http://cds.cern.ch/record/1596278 [Google Scholar]
  7. Alwall, Johan and Schuster, Philip and Toro, Natalia, “Simplified Models for a First Characterization of New Physics at the LHC”, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 075020, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.79.075020, arXiv:0810.3921. [Google Scholar]
  8. CMS Collaboration, “Interpretation of searches for supersymmetry with simplified models”, CMS-SUS-11-016 (2013), arXiv:1301.2175. [Google Scholar]
  9. Sjöstrand, Torbjorn and Mrenna, Stephen and Skands, Peter Z., “PYTHIA 6.4 Physics and Manual”, JHEP 05 (2006) 026, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2006/05/026, arXiv:hep-ph/0603175. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Beenakker, Wim and Höpker, R. and Spira, M. and Zerwas, P.M., “Squark and gluino production at hadron colliders”, Nucl. Phys. B 492 (1997) 51, doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(97)00084-9 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kulesza, Anna and Motyka, L., “Threshold resummation for squark-antisquark and gluino-pair production at the LHC”, Phys. Rev.t. 102 (2009) 111802, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.111802 [Google Scholar]
  12. Kulesza, Anna and Motyka, L., “Soft gluon resummation for the production of gluino-gluino and squark-antisquark pairs at the LHC”, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 095004, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.80.095004 [Google Scholar]
  13. Beenakker, Wim and Brensing, Silja and Krämer, Michael and Kulesza, Anna and Laenen, Eric and Niessen, Irene, “Soft-gluon resummation for squark and gluino hadroproduction”, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2009) 041, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2009/12/041 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Beenakker, Wim and Brensing, Silja and Krämer, Michael and Kulesza, Anna and Laenen, Eric and Motyka, Leszek and Niessen, Irene, “Squark and gluino hadroproduction”, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 26 (2011) 2637, doi:10.1142/S0217751X11053560 [Google Scholar]
  15. M. Kramer et. al., “Supersymmetry production cross sections in ppcollisions at √s = 7 TeV”, arXiv:1206.2892 [Google Scholar]
  16. Alex L. Read, “Presentation of search results: the CLs technique”, Journal of Physics G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 28 (2002) 2693, doi:10.1088/0954-3899/28/10/313 [Google Scholar]
  17. Tom Junk, “Confidence level computation for combining searches with small statistics”, Nuclear Instruments and Methods A434 (1999) 435, doi:10.1016/S0168-9002(99)00498-2, arXiv:hepex/9902006 [Google Scholar]
  18. ATLAS and CMS Collaborations, “Procedure for the LHC Higgs boson search combination in Summer 2011”, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2011-011, CMS NOTE-2011/005, https://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1379837 [Google Scholar]
  19. Nadolsky, Pavel M. and others, “Implications of CTEQ global analysis for collider observables”, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 013004, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.78.013004, arXiv:0802.0007 [Google Scholar]
  20. Martin, A.D. and others, “Parton distributions for the LHC”, Eur. Phys. J. C 63 (2009) 189, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-009-1072-5, arXiv:0901.0002 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.