Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web of Conferences
Volume 77, 2014
16th International Congress of Metrology
Article Number 00022
Number of page(s) 7
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/20147700022
Published online 19 August 2014
  1. G.D. Flux, M. Bardiès, C. Chiesa et al, “Clinical radionuclide therapy dosimetry: the quest for the “Holy Gray””, Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 34,1 (2007).
  2. G.D. Flux, H. Masud, S.J. Chittenden et al, “A doseeffect correlation for radioiodine ablation in differentiated thyroid cancer”, Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 37:270–275 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. L. Mo, B. Avci B, D. James, et al., “Development of activity standard for 90Y microspheres” . Appl. Radiat. Isot. 63, 193–199 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. R. Broda, P. Cassette, K. Kossert, “Radionuclide metrology using liquid scintillation counting”. Metrologia 44, S36–S52 (2007). [CrossRef]
  5. Capogni, M., De Felice, P., Fazio, A., Latini, F., Abbas, K., 2008. “Development of a primary standard for calibration of 64Cu activity measurement systems”. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 66(6–7), 948–53 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. K. Kossert, “Activity standardization by means of a new Čerenkov counting technique“. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 68, 1116–1120 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. S. Agostinelli; et al., “Geant4 – a simulation toolkit”. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 506, 250–303 (2003). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  8. C. Bobin, C. Thiam, J. Bouchard, F. Jaubert, “ Application of stochastic TDCR model based on Geant4 for Cherenkov primary measurements”, Appl. Radiat. Isot. 68, 2366–2371 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. R. Lhommel, P. Goffette, M. Van den Eynde, et al “Yttrium-90 TOF PET scan demonstrates high-resolution biodistribution after liver SIRT”. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 36, 1696 (2009) [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. L. Van Elmbt, S. Vandenberghe, S. Walrand, et al “Comparison of yttrium-90 quantitative imaging by TOF and non-TOF PET in a phantom of liver selective internal radiotherapy”. Phys Med Biol 56:6759–6777 (2011) [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. S. Walrand, G.D. Flux, M.W. Konijnenberg, et al. “Dosimetry of yttrium-labelled radiopharmaceuticals for internal therapy: 86Y or 90Y imaging?” Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 38 (suppl): S57–S68 (2011) [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. M. D’Arienzo, P. Chiaramida, L. Chiacchiararelli, et al: “90Y-PET-based dosimetry after selective internal radiotherapy treatments”. Nucl Med Commun 33:633–640 (2012) [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. O. Bagni, M. D’Arienzo, P. Chiaramida, L. Chiacchiararelli, et al “90Y-PET for the assessment of microsphere biodistribution after selective internal radiotherapy” Nucl Med Commun. 33 (2):198–204 (2012). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. K. Willowson, N. Forwood, B.W. Jakoby et al “Quantitative 90Y image reconstruction in PET” Med Phys, 39:7153–7159 (2012). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. C. Fabbri, V. Mattone, M. Casi et al “Quantitative evaluation on [90Y] DOTATOC PET and SPECT imaging by phantom acquisitions and clinical applications in locoregional and systemic treatments” QJNM 56: 522–528 (2012)
  16. V.V.A.A, Mathematical Techniques in Nuclear Medicine, Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine, (2011).
  17. M. Pacilio M, N. Lanconelli, S. Lo Meo et al, “Differences among Monte Carlo codes in the calculations of voxel S values for radionuclide targeted therapy and analysis of their impact on absorbed dose evaluations” Med Phys 36,1543 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. J.M. Franquiz, S. Chigurupati, K. Kandagatla, “Beta voxel S values for internal emitter dosimetry” Med Phys 30,1030 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. J.M. Pereira, M.J. Stabin, F.R. Lima et al, “Image Quantification for Radiation Dose Calculations – Limitation and Uncertainties”, Health Phys 99:688–701 (2012). [CrossRef]
  20. K. Sjogreen, M. Ljungberg, S.E. Strand, “An Activity Quantification Method Based on Registration of CT and Whole Body Scintillation Camera Images, with Application to 131I”, J. Nucl. Med 43:972–982 (2002). [PubMed]
  21. Y.K. Dewaraja, S.J. Wilderman, M. Ljungberg et al, “Accurate dosimetry in I-131 radionuclide therapy using patient specific 3-dimensional methods for SPECT reconstruction and absorbed dose calculation”, J. Nucl. Med 46:840–849 (2005). [PubMed]
  22. M. D’Arienzo, F. Cicone, L. Chiacchiararelli, “Three-Dimensional Patient-Specific Dosimetry in Radioimmunotherapy with 90Y-Ibritumomab-Tiuxetan”, Cancer Biother Radiopharm 27:124–133 (2012). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. M.G. Stabin, “Uncertainties in Internal Dose Calculations for Radiopharmaceutical”, J. Nucl. Med, 49:853–860 (2008a). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. M.G. Stabin, R.B. Sparks, E. Crowe, “OLINDA/EXM: The second-generation personal computer software for internal dose assessment in nuclear medicine”. , J Nucl. Med, 46:1023–1027 (2005). [PubMed]
  25. P. Kletting, S. Schimmel, H.A. Kestler, H. Hänscheid, M. Luster, “Molecular radiotherapy: The NUKFIT software for calculating the time-integrated activity coefficient”, Medical Physics (to appear).
  26. M.G. Cox, “Modelling clinical decay data using exponential functions”. In Approximation algorithms for complex systems, A.I.E.H. Georgoulis and J. Levesley, Eds., Springer-Verlag, 184–203 (2011).
  27. M.G. Cox, H.E. Joyce, J.C. Mason, “Approximation by sums of exponentials to decay functions using piecewise linear models”. In Approximation theory IX, Volume I: Theoretical Analysis. C.K. Chui and L.L. Schumaker, Eds., Vanderbilt University Press, 89–96 (1998).
  28. BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP, and OIML, Evaluation of measurement data — Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology, JCGM 100:2008 (2008). http://www.bipm.org/utils/common/documents/jcgm/JCGM_100_2008_E.pdf.
  29. BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP, and OIML, Evaluation of measurement data – Supplement 1 to the “Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement” — Propagation of distributions using a Monte Carlo method. Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology, JCGM 101:2008 (2008). http://www.bipm.org/utils/common/documents/jcgm/JCG M_101_2008_E.pdf.
  30. BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP, and OIML, Evaluation of measurement data — Supplement 2 to the “Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement” — Extension to any number of output quantities. Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology, JCGM 102:2011 (2011). http://www.bipm.org/utils/common/documents/jcgm/JCGM_102_2011_E.pdf
  31. J. Wang, T. Li, “Iterative image reconstruction for CBCT using edge-preserving prior”, Med Phys. 36: 252–260 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.