Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web of Conferences
Volume 81, 2014
MESON 2014 – 13th International Workshop on Production, Properties and Interaction of Mesons
Article Number 01006
Number of page(s) 6
Section Plenary talks
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/20148101006
Published online 26 November 2014
  1. R.Hofstadter, Rev. Mod. Phys. 28, 214 (1956). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. GEp and GMp from Rosenbluth separation: I.A.Qattan et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 142301 (2005); [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. M.E.Christy et al., Phys. Rev. C 70, 015206 (2004); [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. L.Andivahis et al., Phys. Rev. D 50, 5491 (1994); [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. R.C.Walker et al., Phys. Rev. D 49, 5671 (1994); [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. F.Borkowski et al., Nucl. Phys. A 222, 269 (1974); [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Nucl. Phys. B 93, 461 (1975); [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. W.Bartel et al., Nucl. Phys. B 58, 429 (1973); [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. C.Berger et al., Phys. Lett. B 35, 87 (1971); [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. J.Litt et al., Phys. Lett. B 31, 40 (1970); [Google Scholar]
  11. T.Janssens et al., Phys. Rev. 142, 922 (1966). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. GEp from forward-angle cross section: G.G.Simon et al., Nucl. Phys. A 333, 381 (1980); [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. J.J.Murphy, Y.M.Shin, and D.M.Skopik, Phys. Rev. C 9, 2125 (1974). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. GMp from large-angle or high-Q2 cross section: A.F.Sill et al., Phys. Rev. D 48, 29 (1993); [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. P.E.Bosted et al., Phys. Rev. C 42, 38 (1990). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. J.J.Kelly, Phys. Rev. C 70, 068202 (2004). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ratio µpGEp /GMp from polarized target: C.B.Crawford et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 052301 (2007); [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. M.K.Jones et al., Phys. Rev. C 74, 035201 (2006). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ratio µpGEp /GMp from recoil polarization, Jlab/Hall C at high Q2: A.J.R.Puckett et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 242301 (2010); [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. M.Meziane et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 132501 (2011); [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Jlab/Hall A at high Q2: V.Punjabi et al., Phys. Rev. C 71, 055202 (2005); [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Erratum-ibid. Phys. Rev. C 71, 069902(E) (2005) [Google Scholar]
  23. superseding M.Jones et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1398 (2000); [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. O.Gayou et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 092301 (2002); [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Jlab/Hall A at low Q2: X.Zhan et al., Phys. Lett. B 705, 59 (2011); [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. G.Ron et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 202002 (2007); [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. B.Hu et al. Phys. Rev. C 73, 064004 (2006); [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. S.Strauch et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 052301 (2003); [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. O.Gayou et al., Phys. Rev. C 64, 038202 (2001); [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. G.MacLachlan et al., Nucl. Phys. A 764, 261 (2006); [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. MAMI: T.Pospischil et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 12, 125 (2001); [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  32. S.Dieterich et al., Phys. Lett. B 500, 47 (2001); [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. MIT-Bates: B.Milbrath et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 452 (1998); [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Erratum-ibid. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2221(E) (1999). [Google Scholar]
  35. J.C.Bernauer et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 242001 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  36. J.C.Bernauer et al., Phys. Rev. C 90, 015206 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  37. S.Gilad et al., PR12-07-108, Hall A. [Google Scholar]
  38. R.Gilman et al., Proposal E08-007, Jefferson Lab, Hall A. [Google Scholar]
  39. P.A.M.Guichon and M.Vanderhaeghen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 142303 (2003); [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. M.P.Rekalo and E.Tomasi-Gustafsson, Eur. Phys. J. A 22, 331 (2004). [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  41. Y.C.Chen, C.W.Kao, and S.N.Yang, Phys. Lett. B 652, 269 (2007). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. J.Guttmann, N.Kivel, M.Meziane, and M.Vanderhaeghen, Eur. Phys. J.A 47, 77 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  43. P.G.Blunden, W.Melnitchouk, and J.A.Tjon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 142304 (2003); [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. P.G.Blunden, W.Melnitchouk, and J.A.Tjon, Phys. Rev. C 72, 034612 (2005); [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. S.Kondratyuk, P.Blunden, W.Melnitchouk, and T.A.Tjon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 172503 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. D.Borisyuk and A.Kobushkin, Phys. Rev. C 78, 025208 (2008); [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. M.Gorchtein, Phys. Lett. B 644, 322 (2007). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  48. Y.C.Chen, A.V.Afanasev, S.J.Brodsky, C.E.Carlson and M.Vanderhaeghen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 122301 (2004); [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. A.V.Afanasev, S.J.Brodsky, C.E.Carlson, Y.C.Chen, and M.Vander-haeghen, Phys. Rev. D 72, 013008 (2005). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  50. N.Kivel and M.Vanderhaeghen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 092004 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Y.S.Tsai, Phys. Rev. 122, 1898 (1961); [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  52. L.W.Mo, Y.S.Tsai, Rev. Mod. Phys. 41, 205 (1969); [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  53. Y.S.Tsai, SLAC report, no. SLAC-PUB-848, 1971 (unpublished); [Google Scholar]
  54. L.C.Maximon, J.A.Tjon, Phys. Rev. C 62, 054320 (2000). [Google Scholar]
  55. Yu.M.Bystritskiy, E.A.Kuraev, E.Tomasi-Gustafsson, Phys. Rev. C 75, 015207 (2007). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  56. F.Maas, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 082001 (2005); [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. L.Capozza, Eur. Phys. J. A 32, 497 (2007). [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  58. J.Arrington et al., Proposal E05-017, Jefferson Lab, Hall C. [Google Scholar]
  59. M.Meziane et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 132501 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. J.Arrington et al., Proposal E04-116, Jefferson Lab, Hall B. [Google Scholar]
  61. J.Arrington et al., Proposal at VEPP-3, Novosibirsk, nucl-ex/0408020 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  62. A Proposal to Definitively Determine the Contribution of Multiple Photon Exchange in Elastic Lepton-Nucleon Scattering (2008); [Google Scholar]
  63. Technical Design Report for the OLYMPUS Experiment (2009); [Google Scholar]
  64. http://web.mit.edu/OLYMPUS. [Google Scholar]
  65. D.Yount and J.Pine, Phys. Rev. 128, 1842 (1962); [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  66. A.Browman, F.Liu, and C.Schaerf, Phys. Rev. 139, B1079 (1965); [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  67. J.Mar et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 21, 482 (1968); [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  68. B.Bouquet et al., Phys. Lett. B 26, 178 (1968). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  69. R.Milner, D.Hasell, M.Kohl, U.Schneekloth et al., “The OLYMPUS Experiment”, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A 741, 1–17 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  70. J.C.Bernauer et al., “The OLYMPUS internal hydrogen target” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A 755, 20–27 (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  71. M.Kohl, Proc. Int. Nuclear and Particle Physics Conference (INPC2013), EPJ Web of Conferences 66, 06009 (2014); [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  72. M.Kohl, Proc. 12th Intern. Conference on Meson-Nucleon Physics and the Structure of the Nucleon (MENU 2010), AIP Conf. Proc. 1374, 527 (2011); [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  73. M.Kohl, Proc. Int. Workshop on Positrons at Jefferson Lab (JPOS2009), AIP Conf. Proc. 1160, 19 (2009); [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  74. D.Hasell et al., Nucl. Instr. and Methods in Physics Research A 603, 247 (2009). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  75. C.B.Crawford et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 052301 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. E.Geis et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 042501 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. C.Zhang et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 252501 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.