Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web of Conferences
Volume 92, 2015
EFM14 – Experimental Fluid Mechanics 2014
Article Number 02117
Number of page(s) 4
Section Contributions
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/20159202117
Published online 06 May 2015
  1. ISO 3846 (2008)
  2. M. G. Bos, Discharge measurement structures. (ILRI, Wageningen, 1989)
  3. W. H. Hager, Discharge measurement structures. (EPFL, Lausanne, 1986)
  4. S. Muller, P. Guiraud, A. Line, J. Hydraul. Res., 49, 2 (2011) [CrossRef]
  5. Z. Zachoval, I. Mistrová, L. Roušar, J. Šulc, P. Zubík, J. Hydrol. Hydromech., 60, 4, 288-298 (2012)
  6. Z. Zachoval, M. Knéblová, L. Roušar, J. Rumann, J. Šulc, J. Hydrol. Hydromech., 62, 2, 145-149 (2014) [CrossRef]
  7. Z. Zachoval, P. Zubík, I. Mistrová, L. Roušar, Experimentální výzkum a numerické modelování úplavu za návodní hranou přelivu se širokou korunou obdélníkového průřezu. (BUT, Brno, 2012)
  8. N. Rajaratnam, D. Muralidhar, J. Hydraul. Res., 9, 2 (1971)
  9. O. Baud, W. H. Hager, J. Envi. Eng., 126, 2 (2000)
  10. C. A. Gonzalez, H. Chanson, Flow Meas. Inst., 18 (2007) [CrossRef]
  11. M. S. Kirkgoz, M. S. Akoz, A. A., Oner, Canadian J. Civil Eng., 35, 9, 975–986 (2008) [CrossRef]
  12. Z. Zachoval, L. Roušar, Transport dnových splavenin přes přeliv pravoúhlého průřezu se širokou korunou. (BUT, Brno, 2014)
  13. Moss, W. D., J. Fluid Mech., 52, 2, 307-320 (1972) [CrossRef]
  14. P. M. Sreetharan, Analytical and experimental investigation of flow measurement by long-based weirs in the rectilinear and curvilinear ranges. (The Hatfield Polytechnic, Hatfield 1983)
  15. F. Dias, J. B. Keller, J.-M. Vanden-Broeck, Phys. Fluids, 31, 8, 2071-2076 (1988) [CrossRef]
  16. F. A. Bombardeli, M. H. García, M. E. Caisley. HydroInformatics 4th (2000)
  17. V. Yakhot, S. A. Orszag, Phys. Review Letters, 57, 14 (1986) [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. W. H. Hager, M., J. Schwalt, Irrig. Drainage Eng. 120, 1, 13-26 (1994) [CrossRef]
  19. M. A. Sarker, D. G. Rhodes, Flow Meas. Instrument., 15, 4, 215-219, (2004) [CrossRef]
  20. B. E. Launder, D. B. Spalding, Computer Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 3, 2, 269–289 (1974) [CrossRef]
  21. C. W. Hirt, B. D. Nichols, J. Comp. Phys. 39 (1981)
  22. D. M. Hargreaves, H. P. Morvan, N. G. Wright, Eng. Appl. Comp. Fluid Mech., 1, 2, 136-146. (2007)
  23. B. E. Launder, G. J. Reece, W. Rodi, J. Fluid Mech., 68, 3, (1975) [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
  24. T. Hsu, E. C. Ozdemir, Study of complex flows through SFWMD culvert structures by CFD modeling. University of Florida (2007)
  25. D. C. Wilcox, AIAA J., 26, 11, 1299–1310 (1988) [CrossRef]
  26. R. J. Adrian, Annual Rev. Fluid Mech., 23, 261–304 (1991) [CrossRef]
  27. A. O. Adegbulugbe, A computational fluid dynamic validation study for the prediction and analysis of free surface flow over a broad crested weir. (The University of Leeds, Leeds, 2010)
  28. F. R. Menter, Two-Equation Eddy-Viscosity Turbulence Models for Engineering Applications (NASA, 1992)
  29. Z. Zachoval, J. Pařílková, L. Roušar, 26th Symposium on Anemometry, Inst. Hydromech. ASCR, Litice, 113-119 (2012)
  30. C. G. Speziale, S. Sarkar, T. B. Gatski, Modeling the presure-strain correlation of turbulence – an invariant dynamical systems approach (NASA, 1990)

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.