Open Access
EPJ Web of Conferences
Volume 95, 2015
3rd International Conference on New Frontiers in Physics
Article Number 03022
Number of page(s) 19
Section Plenary
Published online 29 May 2015
  1. CLICdp collaboration, [Google Scholar]
  2. L. Linssen et al. (eds), Physics and Detectors at CLIC: CLIC Conceptual Design Report, ANLHEP-TR-12-01, CERN-2012-003, DESY 12-008, KEK Report 2011-7, arXiv:1202.5940, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Aicheler et al. (eds), A Multi-TeV Linear Collider based on CLIC Technology: CLIC Conceptual Design Report, CERN-2012-007, JAI-2012-001, KEK Report 2012-1, PSI-12-01, SLAC-R-985, 2012; [Google Scholar]
  4. P. Lebrun et al. (eds), The CLIC Programme: Towards a Staged e+e Linear Collider Exploring the Terascale: CLIC Conceptual Design Report, CERN-2012-005, ANL-HEP-TR-12-51, KEK-Report-2012-2, MPP-2012-115, arXiv:1209.2543, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  5. T. Behnke et al. (eds), The International Linear Collider: Technical Design Report, Volume 1, CERN-ATS-2013-037, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  6. T. Abe et al., The International Large Detector: Letter of Intent, arXiv:1006.3369, 2010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. H. Aihara et al., SiD Letter of Intent, arXiov:0911.0006, 2009 [Google Scholar]
  8. D. Dannheim, Vertex-Detector R&D for CLIC, CLICdp-Conf-2014-004; [Google Scholar]
  9. N. Alipour Tehrani and P. Roloff, Optimisation studies for the CLIC vertex-detector geometry, CLICdp-Note-2014-002; [Google Scholar]
  10. S. Redford, R&D for the Vertexing at CLIC, CLICdp-Conf-2014-008. [Google Scholar]
  11. M.A. Thomson, Particle Flow Calorimetry and the PandoraPFA Algorithm, Nucl. Inst. Meth. A 611 (2009) 25; [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  12. J. Marshall, A. Münnich and M.A. Thomson, Performance of particle flow calorimetry at CLIC, Nucl. Inst. Meth. A 700 (2013 153. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. FCAL collaboration, H. Abramowicz et al., Forward Instrumentation for ILC Detectors, JINST 5 (2010) P12002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. CLICdp collaboration, H. Abramowicz et al., Physics at the CLIC e+e Linear Collider, Input to the Snowmass process, arXiv:1307.5288[hep-ex], 2013. [Google Scholar]
  15. S. Agostinelli et al., GEANT4, a simulation toolkit, Nucl. Inst. Meth. A 506 (2003) 250; [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  16. J. Allison et al., GEANT4, developments and applications, IEEE Tran. Nucl. Sc. 53 (2006) 270 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. M.A. Thomson and K. Mei, AWLC14, Fermilab, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  18. K. Seidel et al., Top quark mass measurements at and above threshold at CLIC, Eur. Phys. J. C 73 (2013) 2530. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  19. A.H. Hoang and T. Teubner, Top quark pair production at threshold: Uncertainties and relativistic corrections, Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998) 114023; [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. A.H. Hoang and T. Teubner, Top-quark pair production close to threshold: Top-quark mass, width, and momentum distribution, Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999) 114027. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. E. Coniavitis and A. Ferrari, Pair production of heavy MSSM charged and neutral Higgs bosons in multi-TeV e+e collisions at the Compact Linear Collider, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 015004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. A. De Roeck, J. R. Ellis and F. Gianotti, Physics motivations for future CERN accelerators, CERN-TH/2001-023, arXiv:hep-ex/0112004, 2001. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.