Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web of Conferences
Volume 111, 2016
WONDER-2015 – 4th International Workshop On Nuclear Data Evaluation for Reactor applications
Article Number 02005
Number of page(s) 7
Section Microscopic Nuclear data Measurements
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201611102005
Published online 25 March 2016
  1. N. Colonna et al, Energy Environ. Sci. 3, 1910–1917 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. International Atomic Energy Agency, Status and advances in Mox fuel technology IAEA Technical Reports Series 415 (2003) [Google Scholar]
  3. F. Poortmans et al., Nucl. Phys A 207, 342–352 (1973) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. R.W. Hockenbury et al., SP 425, 584–586 (1975) [Google Scholar]
  5. K. Wisshak and F. Kaeppeler, Nucl. Sc. and Eng. 66, 363 (1978) [Google Scholar]
  6. K. Wisshak and F. Kaeppeler, Nucl. Sc. and Eng. 69, 39 (1979) [Google Scholar]
  7. NEA High Request Priority List http://www.nea.fr/dbdata/hprl/ [Google Scholar]
  8. Salvatores and R. Jacqmin, Uncertainty and target accuracy assessment for innovative system using recent covariance data evaluations (NEA/WPEC-26, 2008) [Google Scholar]
  9. G. Noguere, E. Dupont, J. Tommasi and D. Bernard. Technical note CEA Cadarache, NT-SPRC/LEPH-05/204 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  10. J. Tommasi, E. Dupont and P. Marimbeau., Nucl. Sci. Eng. 154, 119–133 (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. E. Rich, G. Noguere, C. De Saint Jean and O. Serot. Proceedings of the Int. Conf. on Nuclear Data for Science and Technology, Nice, France, 2007 [Google Scholar]
  12. C. Guerrero, E. Mendoza et al. Radiative capture on 242Pu for MOX fuel reactors, CERN-INTC-2013-027 (INTC-P-387) (2013) [Google Scholar]
  13. C. Guerrero et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 49, 27 (2013) [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  14. C. Weiss et al., Nucl Instrum. and Meth. A 799, 90–98 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. C. Guerrero et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 608, 424 (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. P. Mastinu et al., New C6D6 detectors: reduced neutron sensitivity and improved safety, CERN-n_TOF-PUB-2013-002 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  17. S. Marrone et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 517, 389 (2004). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. CHANDA:solving CHAllenges in Nuclear DAta. Project funded by FP7-EURATOM-FISSION, European Commission. [Google Scholar]
  19. R.L. Macklin, J.H. Gibbons, Phys. Rev. 159, 1007 (1967) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Abondano et al., Nucl. Instrum. and Meth. A 521, 454–467 (2004) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. S. Agostinelli et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 506, 250 (2003) [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  22. P. Zugec et al., Pulse Shape Analysis routines for n_TOF-Phase3. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A. To be published (2015) [Google Scholar]
  23. M. Barbagallo et al., (The n_TOF Collaboration), EPJ A 49, 156 (2013) [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.