Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web of Conferences
Volume 112, 2016
6th International Conference on Physics Opportunities at an Electron-Ion Collider
Article Number 01021
Number of page(s) 7
Section Spin and 3D Structure
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201611201021
Published online 21 March 2016
  1. J. Botts and G. F. Sterman, Nucl. Phys. B 325, 62 (1989). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. H. n. Li and G. F. Sterman, Nucl. Phys. B 381, 129 (1992). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. G. P. Lepage and S. J. Brodsky, Phys. Rev. D 22, 2157 (1980). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. J. C. Collins, Acta Phys. Polon. B 34, 3103 (2003) [hep-ph/0304122]. [Google Scholar]
  5. S. Nandi and H. n. Li, Phys. Rev. D 76, 034008 (2007) [arXiv:0704.3790 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. F. Feng, J. P. Ma and Q. Wang, Phys. Lett. B 674, 176 (2009) [arXiv:0807.0296 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. H. n. Li, Y. L. Shen, Y. M. Wang and H. Zou, Phys. Rev. D 83, 054029 (2011) [arXiv:1012.4098 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. H. n. Li, Y. L. Shen and Y. M. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 85, 074004 (2012) [arXiv:1201.5066 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. W. F. Wang and Z. J. Xiao, Phys. Rev. D 86, 114025 (2012) [arXiv:1207.0265 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. H. N. Li, Y. L. Shen and Y. M. Wang, JHEP 1302, 008 (2013) [arXiv:1210.2978 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. H. N. Li, Y. L. Shen and Y. M. Wang, JHEP 1401, 004 (2014) [arXiv:1310.3672 [hep-ph]]. [Google Scholar]
  12. S. Cheng, Y. Y. Fan, X. Yu, C. D. Lü and Z. J. Xiao, Phys. Rev. D 89, 094004 (2014) [arXiv:1402.5501 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Y. L. Shen and Y. M. Wang, EPJ Web Conf. 80, 00047 (2014) [arXiv:1409.1048 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  14. Y. M. Wang, Int. J. Mod. Phys. Conf. Ser. 37, 1560049 (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. S. S. Agaev, V. M. Braun, N. Offen and F. A. Porkert, Phys. Rev. D 83, 054020 (2011) [arXiv:1012.4671 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. J. Collins, “Foundations of perturbative QCD,” Cambridge monographs on particle physics, nuclear physics and cosmology, 32. [Google Scholar]
  17. B. Melic, D. Mueller and K. Passek-Kumericki, Phys. Rev. D 68, 014013 (2003) [hepph/0212346]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. A. Bacchetta, D. Boer, M. Diehl and P. J. Mulders, JHEP 0808, 023 (2008) [arXiv:0803.0227 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. H. n. Li and Y. M. Wang, JHEP 1506, 013 (2015) [arXiv:1410.7274 [hep-ph]]. [Google Scholar]
  20. J. Collins, Int. J. Mod. Phys. Conf. Ser. 4, 85 (2011) [arXiv:1107.4123 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. I. O. Cherednikov, T. Mertens and F. F. Van der Veken, “Wilson lines in quantum field theory,” De Gruyter Stud. Math. Phys. 24 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  22. J. C. Collins and D. E. Soper, Nucl. Phys. B 193, 381 (1981) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. [Nucl. Phys. B 213, 545 (1983)]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.