Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web of Conferences
Volume 117, 2016
12th International Conference on Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions 2015
Article Number 10002
Number of page(s) 12
Section X. New Facilities and Detectors
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201611710002
Published online 11 May 2016
  1. E. Kugler E, Hyperfine Interactions 129 (2000) 23. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. E. Mané, et al., Eur. Phys. J. A42 (2009) 503. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  3. V.I. Mishin, et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods B 73 (1993) 550. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. V. Fedoseyev, et al., Hyperfine Interactions, 127 (2000) 409. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. B. A. Marsh, et al., Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, 317 (2013) 550. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. H. De Witte, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2007) 112502. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. M. Seliverstov, et al., Eur. Phys. J., A41 (2009) 315. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  8. T. E. Cocolios, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 052203. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Seliverstov, et al., Phys. Rev. C 89 (2014) 034323. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. J. Elseviers, et al., Phys. Rev. C 84, 034307 (2011); [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. A. N. Andreyev, et al., Phys. Rev. C 87, 054311 (2013); [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. C. van Beveren, et al., submitted to Phys. Rev. C (2015). [Google Scholar]
  13. B. A. Marsh, et al., in preparation [Google Scholar]
  14. D. Habs, et al., Hyperfine Interactions 129 (2000) 43. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. D. Voulot, et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods B 266 (2008) 4103. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. F Ames, et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 538 (2005) 17. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. B Wolf, et al., Rev. Scien. Instr. 73 (2002) 682. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. T. Siebert, et al., Nucl. Phys. A 701 (2002) 656. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. J Eberth, et al., Progr. Part. Nucl. Phys. 46 (2001) 389. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. A. Ostrowski, et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 480 (2002) 448. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. H B Jeppesen, et al., 2005 Nucl. Phys. A 748 (2005) 374. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. O. Tengblad, et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 525 (2004) 458. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. V. Bildstein, et al., Progr. Part. Nucl. Phys. 59 (2007) 386. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Th. Kröll it et al., Procedings of “Nuclear Structure and Dynamics ‘09 AIP Conf. Proceedings 1165 (2009) 363. [Google Scholar]
  25. P. Van Duppen and K. Riisager, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 38 (2011) 024005. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. L. P. Gaffney, et al., Nature 497 (2013) 199. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. HIE-ISOLDE, the scientific opportunities ed. By K. Riisager, P. Butler, M. Huyse and R. Krücken, CERN Report, CERN-2007-008. [Google Scholar]
  28. V. Bildstein, et al., Eur. Phys. J. A bf 48 (2012) 85. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  29. C. E. Demonchy, et al., Nuc. Instrum. Methods in Physics Research A 583 (2007) 341. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.