Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web of Conferences
Volume 118, 2016
International Workshop on “Flavour Changing and Conserving Processes” 2015 (FCCP 2015)
Article Number 01002
Number of page(s) 8
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201611801002
Published online 26 April 2016
  1. K. Melnikov, Theory review on the muon g-2
  2. M. Knecht, Perspectives on the hadronic contribution to the muon g-2
  3. M. Procura, Recent developments in the calculation of the hadronic light-by-light contribution to the muon g-2
  4. L. Capiello, What does holographic QCD predicts for the light-by-light scattering contribution to (g - 2)μ
  5. D. Greynat, Hadronic contributions to the muon anomaly in the Constituent Chiral Quark Model
  6. A. Nyffeler, On the precision of a data-driven estimate of the pseudoscalar-pole contribution to hadronic lightby-light scattering in the muon g-2
  7. C. Lehner, Hadronic light-by-light contribution to (g-2)μ from lattice QCD
  8. M. Vanderhaeghen (by proxy due to a Lufthansa strike), Hadronic Light by Light corrections to (g-2)
  9. G. W. Bennett et al. [Muon g-2 Collaboration], Phys. Rev. D 73, 072003 (2006) [hep-ex/0602035]. [CrossRef]
  10. J. Bijnens and J. Prades, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 22, 767 (2007) [hep-ph/0702170]. [CrossRef]
  11. J. Prades, E. de Rafael and A. Vainshtein, “Hadronic Light-by-Light Scattering Contribution to the Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment,” (Advanced series on directions in high energy physics. 20) [arXiv:0901.0306 [hep-ph]].
  12. F. Jegerlehner and A. Nyffeler, Phys. Rept. 477, 1 (2009) [arXiv:0902.3360 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef]
  13. J. Bijnens, E. Pallante and J. Prades, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1447 (1995) [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3781 (1995)] [hep-ph/9505251]. [CrossRef]
  15. J. Bijnens, E. Pallante and J. Prades, Nucl. Phys. B 474, 379 (1996) [hep-ph/9511388]. [CrossRef]
  16. J. Bijnens, E. Pallante and J. Prades, Nucl. Phys. B 626, 410 (2002) [hep-ph/0112255]. [CrossRef]
  17. E. de Rafael, Phys. Lett. B 322, 239 (1994) [hep-ph/9311316]. [CrossRef]
  18. M. Hayakawa, T. Kinoshita and A. I. Sanda, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 790 (1995) [hep-ph/9503463]. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. M. Hayakawa, T. Kinoshita and A. I. Sanda, Phys. Rev. D 54, 3137 (1996) [hep-ph/9601310]. [CrossRef]
  20. M. Hayakawa and T. Kinoshita, Phys. Rev. D 57, 465 (1998) [CrossRef]
  21. [Phys. Rev. D 66, 019902 (2002)] [hep-ph/9708227].
  22. G. Eichmann, C. S. Fischer, W. Heupel and R. Williams, arXiv:1411.7876 [hep-ph].
  23. J. Bijnens and J. Relefors, work in progress.
  24. M. Knecht and A. Nyffeler, Phys. Rev. D 65, 073034 (2002) [hep-ph/0111058]. [CrossRef]
  25. J. Bijnens, C. Bruno and E. de Rafael, Nucl. Phys. B 390, 501 (1993) [hep-ph/9206236]. [CrossRef]
  26. J. Bijnens, Phys. Rept. 265, 369 (1996) [hep-ph/9502335]. [CrossRef]
  27. M. Knecht, A. Nyffeler, M. Perrottet and E. de Rafael, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 071802 (2002) [hep-ph/0111059]. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. M. J. Ramsey-Musolf and M. B. Wise, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 041601 (2002) [hep-ph/0201297]. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. A. E. Dorokhov and W. Broniowski, Phys. Rev. D 78, 073011 (2008) [arXiv:0805.0760 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef]
  30. T. Goecke, C. S. Fischer and R. Williams, Phys. Rev. D 83, 094006 (2011) [CrossRef]
  31. [Phys. Rev. D 86, 099901 (2012)] [arXiv:1012.3886 [hep-ph]].
  32. L. Cappiello, O. Cata and G. D’Ambrosio, Phys. Rev. D 83, 093006 (2011) [arXiv:1009.1161 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef]
  33. D. Greynat and E. de Rafael, JHEP 1207, 020 (2012) [arXiv:1204.3029 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef]
  34. A. Nyffeler, Phys. Rev. D 79, 073012 (2009) [arXiv:0901.1172 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef]
  35. P. Roig, A. Guevara and G. López Castro, Phys. Rev. D 89, no. 7, 073016 (2014) [arXiv:1401.4099 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef]
  36. D. K. Hong and D. Kim, Phys. Lett. B 680, 480 (2009) [arXiv:0904.4042 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef]
  37. K. Melnikov and A. Vainshtein, Phys. Rev. D 70, 113006 (2004) [hep-ph/0312226]. [CrossRef]
  38. T. Goecke, C. S. Fischer and R. Williams, Phys. Rev. D 87, no. 3, 034013 (2013) [arXiv:1210.1759 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  39. A. E. Dorokhov, A. E. Radzhabov and A. S. Zhevlakov, Eur. Phys. J. C 75, no. 9, 417 (2015) [arXiv:1502.04487 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  40. R. Boughezal and K. Melnikov, Phys. Lett. B 704, 193 (2014) [arXiv:1104.4510 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef]
  41. P. Masjuan and M. Vanderhaeghen, arXiv:1212.0357 [hep-ph].
  42. G. Colangelo, M. Hoferichter, M. Procura and P. Stoffer, JHEP 1409, 091 (2014) [arXiv:1402.7081 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef]
  43. F. Jegerlehner, talk presented at the workshop on Hadronic contributions to the muon anomalous magnetic moment: strategies for improvements of the accuracy of the theoretical prediction, 1-5 April 2014, Waldthausen Castle near Mainz.
  44. F. Jegerlehner, this conference.
  45. V. Pauk and M. Vanderhaeghen, Eur. Phys. J. C 74, no. 8, 3008 (2014) [arXiv:1401.0832 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  46. G. Colangelo, M. Hoferichter, B. Kubis, M. Procura and P. Stoffer, Phys. Lett. B 738, 6 (2014) [arXiv:1408.2517 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef]
  47. J. Bijnens and M. Z. Abyaneh, EPJ Web Conf. 37, 01007 (2012) [arXiv:1208.3548 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  48. M. Z. Abyaneh, arXiv:1208.2554 [hep-ph].
  49. K. T. Engel, H. H. Patel and M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, Phys. Rev. D 86, 037502 (2012) [arXiv:1201.0809 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef]
  50. C. Adolph et al. [COMPASS Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 062002 (2015) [arXiv:1405.6377 [hepex]]. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. K. T. Engel and M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, Phys. Lett. B 738, 123 (2014) [arXiv:1309.2225 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef]
  52. K. Kampf et al., arXiv:1308.2575 [hep-ph].
  53. M. Benayoun et al., arXiv:1407.4021 [hep-ph].
  54. G. Ecker, J. Gasser, A. Pich and E. de Rafael, Nucl. Phys. B 321, 311 (1989). [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  55. S. Leupold, private communication.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.