Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web of Conferences
Volume 118, 2016
International Workshop on “Flavour Changing and Conserving Processes” 2015 (FCCP 2015)
Article Number 01020
Number of page(s) 8
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201611801020
Published online 26 April 2016
  1. G. W. Bennett et al. [Muon g-2 Collaboration], Phys. Rev. D 73, 072003 (2006). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. We take the results from K. Hagiwara, R. Liao, A.D. Martin, D. Nomura and T. Teubner, J. Phys. G 38, 085003 (2011). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. D. Hertzog, this conference, Next Generation Muon g−2 Experiments [Google Scholar]
  4. A. Czarnecki, B. Krause and W. J. Marciano, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 3267 (1996) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. S. Peris, M. Perrottet and E. de Rafael, Phys. Lett. B 355, 523 (1995) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Czarnecki, B. Krause and W. Marciano, Phys. Rev. D 52, 2619 (1995); [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. A. Czarnecki, W. J. Marciano and A. Vainshtein, Phys. Rev D. 67, 073006 (2003) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Erratum-ibid. D 73 (2006) 119901 [Google Scholar]
  9. C. Gnendiger, D. Stöckinger and H. Stöckinger-Kim, Phys. Rev D. 88, 053005 (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. T. Aoyama, M. Hayakawa, T. Kinoshita and M. Nio, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 111808 (2012). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. A. Kurz, T. Liu, P. Marquard, A. V. Smirnov, V. A. Smirnov and M. Steinhauser, arXiv:1508.00901 [hep-ph]. [Google Scholar]
  12. K. Melnikov and A. Vainshtein, “Theory of the Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment”, Springer Tracts in Modern Physics, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  13. A. Yelkhovsky, On the higher order QED contributions to the muon g−2 value, preprint INP-88-50, (1988) [Google Scholar]
  14. A. Milstein and A. Yelkhovsky, Phys. Lett. B 233, 11 (1989). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. C. Chlouber and M. Samuel, Phys. Rev. D 16, 3596 (1977). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. T. Aoyama, M. Hayakawa, T. Kinoshita and M. Nio, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 11808 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  17. S. Karshenboim, Phys. Atom. Nucl. 56, 857 (1993). [Google Scholar]
  18. G. Mishima, Bound State Effect on the Electron g-2, arXiv:1311.7109 [hep-ph]. [Google Scholar]
  19. K. Melnikov, A. Vainshtein and M. Voloshin, Phys. Rev. D 90, 017301 (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. M. Fael and M. Passera, Phys. Rev. D 90, no. 5, 056004 (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. M. A. Braun, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 54, 1220 (1968) [Google Scholar]
  22. [Sov. Phys. JETP 27, 652 (1968)]. [Google Scholar]
  23. S. Eidelman, this conference, Muon g−2 and hadronic vacuum polarization: recent developments. [Google Scholar]
  24. T. Blum, A. Denig, I. Logashenko, E. de Rafael, B. Lee Roberts, T. Teubner and G. Venanzoni, arXiv:1311.2198 [hep-ph]. [Google Scholar]
  25. M. Davier and B. Malaescu, Eur. Phys. J. C 73, no. 11, 2597 (2013). [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  26. B. Kloss, talk at CIPANP 2015, arXiv:1510.02293 [hep-ph]. [Google Scholar]
  27. F. Jegerlehner, this conference, Leading order hadronic contribution to the electron and muon g−2. [Google Scholar]
  28. M. Benayoun, this conference, VMD-HLS approach to the muon g−2: a solution to the τ−e+e- puzzle. [Google Scholar]
  29. J. Prades, E. de Rafael and A. Vainshtein, “Hadronic Light-by-Light Scattering Contribution to the Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment,” (Advanced series on directions in high energy physics. 20) [arXiv:0901.0306 [hep-ph]]. [Google Scholar]
  30. G. Colangelo, M. Hoferichter, M. Procura and P. Stoffer, JHEP 1409, 091 (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. G. Colangelo, M. Hoferichter, B. Kubis, M. Procura and P. Stoffer, Phys. Lett. B 738, 6 (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. V. Pauk and M. Vanderhaeghen, Phys. Rev. D 90, no. 11, 113012 (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. M. Knecht, A. Nyffeler, M. Perrottet and E. de Rafael, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 071802 (2002). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. K. Melnikov and A. Vainshtein, Phys. Rev. D 70, 113006 (2004). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. J. Bijnens, E. Pallante and J. Prades, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1447 (1995) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. [(E) Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3781 (1995)]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. J. Bijnens, E. Pallante and J. Prades, Nucl. Phys. B 474, 379 (1996). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. J. Bijnens, E. Pallante and J. Prades, Nucl. Phys. B 626, 410 (2002). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. M. Knecht and A. Nyffeler, Phys. Rev. D 65, 073034 (2002). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. J. Erler and G. Toledo Sanchez, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 161801 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. A. A. Pivovarov, Phys. Atom. Nucl. 66, 902 (2003) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. [Yad. Fiz. 66, 934 (2003)]. [Google Scholar]
  43. R. Boughezal and K. Melnikov, Phys. Lett. B 704, 193 (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. D. Greynat and E. de Rafael, JHEP 1207, 020 (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. M. Hayakawa, T. Kinoshita and A. I. Sanda, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 790 (1995). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. M. Hayakawa, T. Kinoshita and A. I. Sanda, Phys. Rev. D 54, 3137 (1996). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. K. T. Engel, H. H. Patel and M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, Phys. Rev. D 86, 037502 (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  48. K. T. Engel and M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, Phys. Lett. B 738, 123 (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  49. J. Bijnens, this conference, Hadronic light-by-light scattering contribution to aμ: extended Nambu-Jona-Lasino, chrial quark models and chiral Lagrangians. [Google Scholar]
  50. A. Nyffeler, this conference, On the precision of a data-driven estimate of the pseudoscalar-pole contribution to hadronic light-by-light scattering in the muon g–2. [Google Scholar]
  51. A. Kupsc, this conference, Transition form factors of light mesons. [Google Scholar]
  52. C. Lehner, this conference, Hadronic light-by-light contribution to (g−2)μ from lattice QCD. [Google Scholar]
  53. D. Stöckinger, this conference, Magnetic moment (g−2)μ and Supersymmetry. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.