Open Access
EPJ Web of Conferences
Volume 119, 2016
The 27th International Laser Radar Conference (ILRC 27)
Article Number 03004
Number of page(s) 4
Section Lidar for Trace Gas Monitoring I
Published online 07 June 2016
  1. Ambrico, P. E., A. A. Amodeo, P. D. Gilaramo, and N. Spinelli, 2000: Sensitivity analysis of differential absorption lidar measurements in the midinfrared region, Appl. Opt., 39, 6847-6865 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ehret G., C. Kiemle, 2005: Requirement definition for future DIAL instruments, final report to ESA contract, p64 [Google Scholar]
  3. Yu J., U. N. Singh, N. P. Barnes, and M. Petros, 1998: 125-mJ diode-pumped injection-seeded Ho:Tm:YLF laser, Optics Letters 23, 780-782 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Koch, G. J., J. Y. Beyon, F. Gibert, B. W. Barnes, S. Ismail, M. Petros, P. J. Petzar, J. Yu, E. A. Modlin, K. J. Davis, and U. N. Singh, 2008: “Side-line tunable laser transmitter for Differential Absorption Lidar measurement of CO2: Design and application to atmospheric measurement”, Appl. Opt. 47, 944-956 [Google Scholar]
  5. G. Anderson, S. Clough, F. Kneizys, J. Chetwynd, and E. Shettle, 1986: AFGL atmospheric constituent profiles (0-120km), Air Force Geophysics Laboratory, AFGL-TR-86–0110, 954 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.