Open Access
EPJ Web of Conferences
Volume 119, 2016
The 27th International Laser Radar Conference (ILRC 27)
Article Number 04007
Number of page(s) 4
Section Poster Session (Spaceborne Lidar)
Published online 07 June 2016
  1. Burton, S. P., et al., 2013: Aerosol classification from airborne HSRL and comparisons with the CALIPSO vertical feature mask, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 1397–1412. [Google Scholar]
  2. Marenco, F., et al., 2014: Airborne verification of CALIPSO products over the Amazon: a case study of daytime observations in a complex atmospheric scene, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 11871–11881. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fountoukis, C. and Nenes, A., 2007: ISORROPIA II: a computationally efficient thermodynamic equilibrium model for K+–Ca2+– Mg2+–NH4 +–Na+–SO42−–NO3–Cl–H2O aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 4639–4659. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Marenco, F., et al., 2011: Airborne Lidar Observations of the 2010 Eyjafjallajökull Volcanic Ash Plume, J. Geophys. Res., 116, D00U05, doi:10.1029/2011JD016396. [Google Scholar]
  5. Rosenberg, P. D., et al., 2012: Particle sizing calibration with refractive index correction for light scattering optical particle counters and impacts upon PCASP and CDP data collected during the Fennec campaign, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 5, 1147–1163. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Highwood, E. J., et al., 2012: Aerosol scattering and absorption during the EUCAARILONGREX flights of the Facility for Airborne Atmospheric Measurements (FAAM) BAe-146: can measurements and models agree?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 7251–7267. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.