Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web of Conferences
Volume 119, 2016
The 27th International Laser Radar Conference (ILRC 27)
Article Number 23017
Number of page(s) 4
Section Poster Session (Aerosol Observations and Retrievals II)
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201611923017
Published online 07 June 2016
  1. Fernald, 1984: Analysis of atmospheric lidar observations: some comments, Appl. Optics, 23, 652–653. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed]
  2. Klett, 1985: Stable analytic inversion solution for processing lidar returns, Appl. Optics, 20, 211–220. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Cattrall et al., 2005: Variability of aerosol and spectral lidar and backscatter and extinction ratios of key aerosol types derived from selected Aerosol Robotic Network locations, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D10S11, doi:10.1029/2004JD005124. [CrossRef]
  4. Mona et al., 2006: Saharan dust intrusions in the Mediterranean area: Three years of Raman lidar measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D16203, doi:10.1029/2005JD006569. [CrossRef]
  5. Müller et al., 2007: Aerosol-type-dependent lidar ratios observed with Raman lidar, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D16202, doi:10.1029/2006JD008292. [CrossRef]
  6. Schuster et al., 2012: Comparison of CALIPSO aerosol optical depth retrievals to AERONET measurements, and a climatology for the lidar ratio of dust, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 7431–7452, doi:10.5194/acp-12-7431-2012. [CrossRef]
  7. Amiridis et al., 2013: Optimizing CALIPSO Saharan dust retrievals, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 12089-12106, doi:10.5194/acp-13-12089-2013. [CrossRef]
  8. Omar et al., 2013: CALIOP and AERONET aerosol optical depth comparisons: One size fits none, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 118, 1–19, doi:10.1002/jgrd.50330. [CrossRef]
  9. Tesche et al., 2013: Ground-based validation of CALIPSO observations of dust and smoke in the Cape Verde region, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 118, 2889–2902, doi:10.1002/jgrd.50248. [CrossRef]
  10. Omar et al., 2009: The CALIPSO Automated Aerosol Classification and Lidar Ratio Selection Algorithm, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 26, 1994-2014, doi:10.1175/2009JTECHA1231.1. [CrossRef]
  11. Mamouri et al., 2013: Low Arabian dust extinction-to-backscatter ratio, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 4762–4766, doi:10.1002/grl.50898. [CrossRef]
  12. Campbell et al., 2002: Full-time, eye-safe cloud and aerosol lidar observation at Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program sites: Instruments and data processing, J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 19, 431– 442, 2002. [CrossRef]
  13. Córdoba-Jabonero et al., 2014: Lidar Ratio discrimination retrieval in a two-layer aerosol system from elastic lidar measurements in synergy with sun-photometry data, Proc. International Conference in Atmospheric Dust (DUST 2014), ProScience, 1, 243-248, published by Digilabs, doi:10.14644/dust.2014.040.
  14. Córdoba-Jabonero et al., 2011: Synergetic monitoring of Saharan dust plumes and potential impact on surface: a case study of dust transport from Canary Islands to Iberian Peninsula, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 3067-3091, doi:10.5194/acp-11-3067-2011. [CrossRef]
  15. Liousse et al., 2010: Updated African biomass burning emission inventories in the framework of the AMMA-IDAF program, with an evaluation of combustion aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 9631-9646, doi:10.5194/acp-10-9631-2010. [CrossRef]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.