Open Access
EPJ Web of Conferences
Volume 119, 2016
The 27th International Laser Radar Conference (ILRC 27)
Article Number 23017
Number of page(s) 4
Section Poster Session (Aerosol Observations and Retrievals II)
Published online 07 June 2016
  1. Fernald, 1984: Analysis of atmospheric lidar observations: some comments, Appl. Optics, 23, 652–653. [Google Scholar]
  2. Klett, 1985: Stable analytic inversion solution for processing lidar returns, Appl. Optics, 20, 211–220. [Google Scholar]
  3. Cattrall et al., 2005: Variability of aerosol and spectral lidar and backscatter and extinction ratios of key aerosol types derived from selected Aerosol Robotic Network locations, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D10S11, doi:10.1029/2004JD005124. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Mona et al., 2006: Saharan dust intrusions in the Mediterranean area: Three years of Raman lidar measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D16203, doi:10.1029/2005JD006569. [Google Scholar]
  5. Müller et al., 2007: Aerosol-type-dependent lidar ratios observed with Raman lidar, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D16202, doi:10.1029/2006JD008292. [Google Scholar]
  6. Schuster et al., 2012: Comparison of CALIPSO aerosol optical depth retrievals to AERONET measurements, and a climatology for the lidar ratio of dust, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 7431–7452, doi:10.5194/acp-12-7431-2012. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Amiridis et al., 2013: Optimizing CALIPSO Saharan dust retrievals, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 12089-12106, doi:10.5194/acp-13-12089-2013. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Omar et al., 2013: CALIOP and AERONET aerosol optical depth comparisons: One size fits none, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 118, 1–19, doi:10.1002/jgrd.50330. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Tesche et al., 2013: Ground-based validation of CALIPSO observations of dust and smoke in the Cape Verde region, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 118, 2889–2902, doi:10.1002/jgrd.50248. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Omar et al., 2009: The CALIPSO Automated Aerosol Classification and Lidar Ratio Selection Algorithm, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 26, 1994-2014, doi:10.1175/2009JTECHA1231.1. [Google Scholar]
  11. Mamouri et al., 2013: Low Arabian dust extinction-to-backscatter ratio, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 4762–4766, doi:10.1002/grl.50898. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Campbell et al., 2002: Full-time, eye-safe cloud and aerosol lidar observation at Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program sites: Instruments and data processing, J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 19, 431– 442, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  13. Córdoba-Jabonero et al., 2014: Lidar Ratio discrimination retrieval in a two-layer aerosol system from elastic lidar measurements in synergy with sun-photometry data, Proc. International Conference in Atmospheric Dust (DUST 2014), ProScience, 1, 243-248, published by Digilabs, doi:10.14644/dust.2014.040. [Google Scholar]
  14. Córdoba-Jabonero et al., 2011: Synergetic monitoring of Saharan dust plumes and potential impact on surface: a case study of dust transport from Canary Islands to Iberian Peninsula, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 3067-3091, doi:10.5194/acp-11-3067-2011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Liousse et al., 2010: Updated African biomass burning emission inventories in the framework of the AMMA-IDAF program, with an evaluation of combustion aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 9631-9646, doi:10.5194/acp-10-9631-2010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.