EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 134 (2017) EPJ Web Conf., 134 (2017) 02005 References
Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 134, 2017
Subnuclear Structure of Matter: Achievements and Challenges
Article Number 02005
Number of page(s) 8
Section Hadron properties
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201713402005
Published online 26 January 2017
  1. U. Löring, K. Kretzschmar, B. Ch. H.R. Metsch Petry, Eur. Phys. J. A 10 (2001) 309–346. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  2. U. Löring, B.Ch. Metsch, H.R. Petry, Eur. Phys. J. A 10 (2001) 395–446. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  3. U. Löring, B.Ch. Metsch, H.R. Petry, Eur. Phys. J. A 10 (2001) 447–486. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  4. U. Löring, K. Kretzschmar, D. Merten, B. Metsch, H.-R. Petry, Eur. Phys. J. A 14 (2002) 477–489. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  5. D. Merten, U. Löring, B. Metsch, H.-R. Petry, Eur. Phys. J. A 18 (2003) 193–195. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  6. B.C. Metsch, Eur. Phys. J. A 35 (2008) 275. doi:10.1140/epja/i2007-10557-4. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  7. S. Kreuzer, “Ein massenabhängiges Confinement Potential für das Bethe-Salpeter Modell”, Diplomarbeit, Universität Bonn, August 2006; [Google Scholar]
  8. T. Van Cauteren, J. Ryckebusch, B. Metsch and H. R. Petry, Eur. Phys. J. A 26 (2005) 339. [arXiv:nuclth/0509047]. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  9. I. G. Aznauryan, V. D. Burkert, G. V. Fedotov, B. S. Ishkhanov, Phys. Rev. C 72 (2005) 045201d [arXiv:hep-ph/0508057]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. C. Haupt, B. Metsch and H. R. Petry, Eur. Phys. J. A 28 (2006) 213 [arXiv:hep-ph/0602151]. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  11. C. Haupt, “Electromagnetic properties of Baryons,” Dissertation, Universität Bonn, April 2006. [Google Scholar]
  12. Particle Data Group, W.-M. Yao et al., J. Phys. G 33 (2006) 1. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. M. Kotulla et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 (2002) 272001 [arXiv:nucl-ex/0210040]. [Google Scholar]
  14. N. B. Wallace et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 74 (1995) 3732. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. H. T. Diehl et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 67 (1991) 804. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. K. Berger et al., Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 094027 [arXiv:nucl-th/0407009]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. S. Migura, D. Merten, B. Metsch and H. R. Petry, Eur. Phys. J. A 28 (2006) 55. [arXiv:hep-ph/0602152] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  18. S. Migura, “Weak and strong baryon decays in a constituent quark model”, Dissertation, Universität Bonn, Juni 2006. [Google Scholar]
  19. D. M. Tolentino Zang, “Final state interactions in strong two-body baryon decays”, Dissertation, Universität Bonn, July 2014. [Google Scholar]
  20. C. Amsler et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Lett. B 667, (2008) 1. [Google Scholar]
  21. T. Melde, W. Plessas, and B. Sengl, Phys. Rev. D 77, 114002 (2008). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. M. Ronniger and B. C. Metsch, Eur. Phys. J. A 47 (2011) 162 doi:10.1140/epja/i2011-11162-8 [arXiv:1111.3835 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  23. M. Ronniger and B. C. Metsch, Eur. Phys. J. A 49 (2013) 8 doi:10.1140/epja/i2013-13008-9 [arXiv:1207.2640 [hep-ph]]. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  24. P. Mergell, U.-G. Meißner and D. Drechsel, Nucl. Phys. A 596, 367 (1996). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. M.E. Christy et al., Phys. Rev. C 70, 015206 (2004). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. I. A. Qattan et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 142301 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. A. Bodek, S. Avvakumov, R. Bradford, and H. Budd, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 110, 082004 (2008). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. T. Eden et al., Phys. Rev. C 50, 1749 (1994). [Google Scholar]
  29. C. Herberg et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 5, 131 (1999). [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  30. M. Ostrick et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 276 (1999). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. I. Passchier et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4988 (1999). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. R. Schiavilla et al., Phys. Rev. C 64, 041002 (2001). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. D. Rohe et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 21 (1999). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. J. Golak et al., Phys. Rev. C 63, 034006 (2001). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. H. Zhu et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 081801 (2001). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. R. Madey et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 122002 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. G. Warren et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 042301 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. D. I. Glazier et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 24, 101 (2005). [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  39. R. Alarcon et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 31, 588 (2007). [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  40. T. Bartel et al., Nucl. Phys. B 58, 469 (1973). [Google Scholar]
  41. H. Anklin et al., Phys. Lett. B 428, 248 (1998). [Google Scholar]
  42. W. Xu et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 (2000). [Google Scholar]
  43. G. Kubon et al., Phys. Lett. B 524, 26 (2002). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.