Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 137, 2017
XIIth Quark Confinement and the Hadron Spectrum
Article Number 09005
Number of page(s) 8
Section Section F: Nuclear and Astroparticle Physics
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201713709005
Published online 22 March 2017
  1. C. Curceanu, K. Piscicchia et al., Acta Phys. Polon. B 46 1, 203–215, (2015). [Google Scholar]
  2. R. Baldini et al., Proposal for a Phi-Factory, report LNF-90/031(R) (1990). [Google Scholar]
  3. F. Bossi, E. De Lucia, J. Lee-Franzini, S. Miscetti, M. Palutan and KLOE coll., Riv. Nuovo Cim. 31 (2008) 531–623 [Google Scholar]
  4. C. Patrignani et al. (Particle Data Group), Chin. Phys. C, 40, 100001 (2016). [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. T. Hyodo, D. Jido, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 67 (2012) 55. [Google Scholar]
  6. Phys. Lett. B 500 (2001), [Google Scholar]
  7. Phys. Rev. C 66 (2002), [Google Scholar]
  8. Nucl. Phys. A 725 (2003), [Google Scholar]
  9. Nucl. Phys. A881, 98 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  10. T. Yamazaki, et al., Phys. Rev. C 76 045201 (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. A. Doté, et al., Phys. Rev. C 79 014003 (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. S. Wycech, et al., Phys. Rev. C 79 014001 (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. N. Barnea, et al., Phys. Lett. B 712 132 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  14. N.V. Shevchenko, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 082301 (2007) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Y. Ikeda, et al., Phys. Rev. C 79 035201 (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. E. Oset, et al., Nucl. Phys. A 881 127 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  17. G. Agakishiev, et al., HADES Coll., Phys. Lett. B 742 242 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  18. M. Agnello, et al. (FINUDA Coll.), Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 212303 (2005) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. T. Yamazaki, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 132502 (2010) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Y. Ichikawa, et al., Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 021D01 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  21. A. O. Tokiyasu et al., Phys. Lett. B 728, 616 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  22. L. Fabbietti et al., Nucl. Phys. A 914, 60 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  23. T. Hashimoto et al., Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 061D01 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  24. K. Piscicchia et al., PoS Bormio2013 034 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  25. A. Scordo et al., PoS Bormio2014 039 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  26. M. Adinolfi et al., [KLOE Collaboration], Nucl. Inst. Meth. A 488, (2002) 51. [Google Scholar]
  27. M. Adinolfi et al. [KLOE Collaboration], Nucl. Inst. Meth. A 482, (2002) 368. [Google Scholar]
  28. O. Vazquez Doce et al., Phys. Lett. B 758, 134–139 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  29. R. Roosen, J. H. Wickens, Il Nuovo Cim. A Series 11, 66 101 (1981) [Google Scholar]
  30. FINUDA Collaboration, Phys. Lett. B, 669 229 (2008) [Google Scholar]
  31. K. Piscicchia, S. Wycech, C. Curceanu, Nucl. Phys. A 954, 75–93 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  32. J. Esmaili et al., Phys. Lett. B 686 (2010) 23–28 [Google Scholar]
  33. FINUDA Collaboration, Phys. Lett. B 704, 474–480 (2011) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.