Open Access
Issue
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 143, 2017
EFM16 – Experimental Fluid Mechanics 2016
Article Number 01001
Number of page(s) 8
Section Keynote Lecture
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201714301001
Published online 12 May 2017
  1. Ferrari, S., Querzoli, G., Mixing and re-entrainment in a negatively buoyant jet, Journal of Hydraulic Research, 48 (5), pp. 632–640. (2010) [Google Scholar]
  2. Rossi, L., Bocquet, S., Ferrari, S., Garcia de la Cruz, J.M., Lardeau, S., Control of flow geometry using electromagnetic body forcing, International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 30 (3), pp. 505–513. (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ramuzat, A., Riethmuller, M.L. Steady and unsteady PIV investigations of flows within a 3D lung bifurcation model, DLR-Mitteilung, (3), pp. 109–119 (2001) [Google Scholar]
  4. Elkins, C.J., Iyengar, A.S., Draney, M.T., Dake, M.D., Medina, F., Wicker, R.B. Rapid in-vitro MRV and PIV measurements in anatomically accurate human thoracic aorta phantoms, Proceedings of the 2005 Summer Bioengineering Conference, 2005, pp. 235–236 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  5. Zhu, H., Qian, M., Zou, Y., Song, R., Niu, L., Jiang, B., Guang, Q., Zheng, H. The validation of Echo- PIV technique used in a stenosis model, 5th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering, iCBBE 2011, art. no. 5780292 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  6. Boffetta G., Celani A. and Vergassola M., Inverse energy cascade in two-dimensional turbulence: deviation from Gaussian behaviour, Physical Review E, 61 (1), R29–R32, (2000). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Meng, J., Tabosa, E., Xie, W., Runge, K., Bradshaw, D., Manlapig, E. A review of turbulence measurement techniques for flotation, Minerals Engineering, 95, pp. 79–95 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Takagi, H., Nakashima, M., Sato, Y., Matsuuchi, K., Sanders, R.H. Numerical and experimental investigations of human swimming motions, Journal of Sports Sciences, 34 (16), pp. 1564–1580, (2016). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Blocken, B., Stathopoulos, T., van Beeck, J.P.A.J. Pedestrian-level wind conditions around buildings: Review of wind-tunnel and CFD techniques and their accuracy for wind comfort assessment, Building and Environment, 100, pp. 50–81 (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fu, S., Biwole, P.H., Mathis, C. Particle tracking velocimetry for indoor airflow field: A review, Building and Environment, 87, pp. 34–44 (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cao, X., Liu, J., Jiang, N., Chen, Q. Particle image velocimetry measurement of indoor airflow field: A review of the technologies and applications, Energy and Buildings, 69, pp. 367–380 (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Allgayer D, Hunt GR. – On the application of the light attenuation technique as a tool for non intrusive buoyancy measurements, Exp. Thermal Fluid Science 38, 257–261 (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hacker J, Linden PF, Dalziel SB. Mixing in lockrelease gravity currents, Dynamics of Atmospheres and Oceans 24, 183–195 (1996). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Choi, K.W., Lai, C.C.K., Lee, J.H.W. Mixing in the intermediate field of dense jets in cross currents, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 142 (1), art. no. 04015041 (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Stewart, T.B., Judeikis, H.S. Measurements of spatial reactant and product concentrations in a flow reactor using laser induced fluorescence, Review of Scientific Instruments, 45 (12), pp. 1542–1545 (1974) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Melton LA, Lipp C.W., Criteria for quantitative PLIF experiments using high-power lasers, Experiments in Fluids 35, 310–316 (2003) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Sutton, J.A., Fisher, B.T., Fleming, J.W. A laser induced fluorescence measurement for aqueous fluid flows with improved temperature sensitivity. Exp. Fluids 45(5), 869–881 (2008). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ferrari, S., Querzoli, G., Laboratory experiments on the interaction between inclined negatively buoyant jets and regular waves, EPJ Web of Conferences, 92, art. no. 02018 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  19. Bouche E., Cazin S., Roig V., Risso F and Billet A.M., Mixing in a swarm of bubbles rising in a confined cell measured by mean of PLIF with two different dyes, 16th Int Symp on Applications of Laser Techniques to Fluid Mechanics Lisbon, Portugal, 09-12 July, 2012 [Google Scholar]
  20. Charogiannis, A., An, J.S., Markides, C.N. A simultaneous planar laser-induced fluorescence, particle image velocimetry and particle tracking velocimetry technique for the investigation of thin liquid-film flows. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 68, pp. 516–536 (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Massing, J., Kaden, D., Kahler, C.J., Cierpka, C. Luminescent two-color tracer particles for simultaneous velocity and temperature measurements in microfluidics, Measurement Science and Technology, 27 (11) (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Someya S., Tominaga K, Li Y, Okamoto K, Combined velocity and temperature measurements of natural convection using temperature sensitive particles, 15th Int Symp on Applications of Laser Techniques to Fluid Mechanics Lisbon, Portugal, 05-08 July, 2010 [Google Scholar]
  23. Ozawa, H. Experimental study of unsteady aerothermodynamic phenomena on shock-tube wall using fast-response temperature-sensitive paints, Physics of Fluids, 28 (4) (2016) [Google Scholar]
  24. Sagaidachnyi, A.A., Volkov, I.U., Fomin, A.V. Influence of temporal noise on the skin blood flow measurements performed by cooled thermal imaging camera: Limit possibilities within each physiological frequency range, Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE, 9917, art. no. 99170N (2016). [Google Scholar]
  25. Ferrari, S., Badas, M.G., Querzoli, G., A nonintrusive and continuous-in-space technique to investigate the wave transformation and breaking over a breakwater, EPJ Web of Conferences, 114, art. no. 02022 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  26. Mendez, M.A., Németh, L., Buchlin, J.-M. Measurement of Liquid Film Thickness via Light Absorption and Laser Tomography, EPJ Web of Conferences, 114, art. no. 02072 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  27. Brady, M.R., Raben, S.G., Vlachos, P.P. Methods for Digital Particle Image Sizing (DPIS): Comparisons and improvements, Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 20 (6), pp. 207–219 (2009). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Bergthorson, J. M. and Dimotakis, P. E., Particle velocimetry in high-gradient/high-curvature flows, Experiments in Fluids, 41 (2), 255–263, (2006). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Dalziel S.B., Decay of rotating turbulence: some particle tracking experiments, Applied Scientific Research, 49, 217–244, (1992). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Querzoli G, A Lagrangian study of particle dispersion in the unstable boundary layer. Atmos Environ 30(16):2821–2829 (1996) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Virant M. and Dracos T., 3D PTV and its application on Lagrangian motion, Measurement Science and Technology, 8, 1539–1552, (1997). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Stanislas M., Okamoto K., Kähler C.J. and Westerweel J., Main results of the Second International PIV Challenge, Experiments in Fluids, 39, 170–191, 2005. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Kähler, C.J., Astarita, T., Vlachos, P.P., Sakakibara, J., Hain, R., Discetti, S., La Foy, R., Cierpka, C. Main results of the 4th International PIV Challenge, Experiments in Fluids, 57 (6) (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Adrian R.J., Particle-imaging techniques for experimental fluid mechanics, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 261–303, (1991). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Buchhave, P. Particle image velocimetry-status and trends, Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 5 (5), pp. 586–604 (1992). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Adrian R.J., Twenty years of particle image velocimetry, Experiments in Fluids, 39 (2) 159–169 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  37. Adrian R.J., Westerweel J., Particle image velocimetry. Cambridge (2011) [Google Scholar]
  38. Stucky, M.J., Nino, E., Gajdeczko, B., Felton, P.G. Two-color particle image velocimetry technique for an internal combustion engine, Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 8 (4), pp. 305–314 (1994) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Falchi, M., Querzoli, G., Romano, G.P. Robust evaluation of the dissimilarity between interrogation windows in image velocimetry, Experiments in Fluids, 41 (2), pp. 279–293 (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. Lucas B.D. and Kanade T., An Iterative Image Registration Technique with an Application to Stereo Vision, Proceedings of Imaging Understanding Workshop, Washington, D.C. (USA), 121–130, 1981. [Google Scholar]
  41. Shi J. and Tomasi C., Good features to track, Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR94), Seattle, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  42. Miozzi, M., Jacob, B., Olivieri, A. Performances of feature tracking in turbulent boundary layer investigation, Experiments in Fluids, 45 (4), pp. 765–780 (2008). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. Cowen EA, Monismith SG. A hybrid digital particle tracking velocimetry technique. Experiments in Fluids;22(3):199–211 (1997) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. Besalduch, L.A., Badas, M.G., Ferrari, S., Querzoli, G., Experimental Studies for the characterization of the mixing processes in negative buoyant jets, EPJ Web of Conferences, 45, art. no. 01012 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  45. Besalduch, L.A., Badas, M.G., Ferrari, S., Querzoli, G., On the near field behavior of inclined negatively buoyant jets, EPJ Web of Conferences, 67, art. no. 02007 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  46. Harris, C. & Stephens, M. A combined corner and edge detector. In: Proceedings of the 4th Aivey Vision Conference, Manchester, 147–151, 1988 [Google Scholar]
  47. La Porta A, Voth GA, Crawford AM, Alexander J, Bodenschatz E, Fluid particle accelerations in fully developed turbulence. Nature 409:1017–1019 (2001) [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Voth GA, La Porta A, Crawford AM, Alexander J, Bodenschatz E, Measurement of particle accelerations in fully developed turbulence. J Fluid Mech 469:121–160 (2002) [Google Scholar]
  49. Mordant N., Pinton J.-F. and Michel O., Timeresolved tracking of a sound scatterer in a complex flow: nonstationary signal analysis and applications, Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 112(1), 108–118, (2002). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Ferrari, S., Rossi, L., Particle tracking velocimetry and accelerometry (PTVA) measurements applied to quasi-two-dimensional multi-scale flows, Experiments in Fluids, 44 (6), pp. 873–886 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  51. Lardeau, S., Ferrari, S., Rossi, L., Three-dimensional direct numerical simulation of electromagnetically driven multiscale shallow layer flows: Numerical modeling and physical properties, Physics of Fluids, 20 (12), art. no. 127101, (2008) [Google Scholar]
  52. Ferrari, S., Rossi, L., Vassilicos, J.C., Acceleration measurements in turbulent-like flows, Advances in Turbulence XI - Proceedings of the 11th EUROMECH European Turbulence Conference, pp. 485–487 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  53. Ferrari, S., Kewcharoenwong, P., Rossi, L., Vassilicos, J.C., Multi-scale flow control for efficient mixing: Laboratory generation of unsteady multi-scale flows controlled by multi-scale electromagnetic forces, Solid Mechanics and its Applications, 7, pp. 267–272 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  54. Ran B. and Katz J., Pressure fluctuation and their effect on cavitation inception within water jets, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 262, 223–263, (1994). [Google Scholar]
  55. Liu X. and Katz J., Instantaneous pressure and material acceleration measurements using a fourexposure PIV system, Experiments in Fluids, 41, 227–240, (2006). [Google Scholar]
  56. Gregory J.W., Sakaue H., Liu T, and Sullivan J.P., Fast Pressure-Sensitive Paint for Flow and Acoustic Diagnostics, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 46: 303–330 (2014) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.