Open Access
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 143, 2017
EFM16 – Experimental Fluid Mechanics 2016
Article Number 02027
Number of page(s) 7
Section Contributions
Published online 12 May 2017
  1. Arts T., Lambert De Rouvroit M., and Rutherford A.W. Aero-thermal investigation of a highly loaded transonic linear turbine guide vane cascade: A test case for inviscid and viscous flow computations. Technical Note 174. Von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics, 1990, p. 97.
  2. Barth Timothy and Jespersen Dennis. “The design and application of upwind schemes on unstructured meshes”. In: 27th Aerospace Sciences Meeting. Reston, Virigina: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1989.
  3. Blazek Jiri. Computational fluid dynamics : principles and applications. Butterworth-Heinemann, 2015, p. 466.
  4. Ferziger Joel H. and Peric Milovan. Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012, p. 426.
  5. Fürst Jiří. “A weighted least square scheme for compressible flows”. In: Flow, Turbulence and Combustion 76.4 (2006), pp. 331–342. [CrossRef]
  6. Greenshields Christopher J. et al. “Implementation of semi-discrete, non-staggered central schemes in a colocated, polyhedral, finite volume framework, for high-speed viscous flows”. In: Inter- national Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 63.1 (2010), pp. 1–21.
  7. Issa R.I. “Solution of the implicitly discretised fluid flow equations by operator-splitting”. In: Journal of Computational Physics 62.1 (1986), pp. 40–65. [CrossRef]
  8. Kožíšek Martin et al. “Implementation of k-kL- ω Turbulence Model for Compressible Flow into OpenFOAM”. In: Applied Mechanics and Materials 821 (2016), pp. 63–69. [CrossRef]
  9. Liou Meng-Sing. “A sequel to AUSM, Part II: AUSM+-up for all speeds”. In: Journal of Computational Physics 214.1 (2006), pp. 137–170. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  10. Menter F. R. “Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications”. en. In: AIAA Journal 32.8 (1994), pp. 1598–1605. [CrossRef]
  11. Menter Florian R. et al. “A one-equation local correlation-based transition model”. In: Flow, Turbulence and Combustion 95.4 (2015), pp. 583–619. [CrossRef]
  12. Moukalled F. and Darwish M. “A High- Resolution Pressure-Based Algorithm for Fluid Flow at All Speeds”. In: Journal of Computational Physics 168.1 (2001), pp. 101–130. [CrossRef]
  13. Šafřík Pavel. “Experimental data from optical measurement tests on a transonic turbine blade cascade”. In: 13th Symposium on Measuring Tech- niques for Transonic and Supersonic Flow in Cascades and Turbomachines. Ed. by Gyarmathy G.) Grossweiler C.. ETH Zurich, 1996, pp. 0–14.
  14. Shen Chun, Sun Fengxian, and Xia Xinlin. “Implementation of density-based solver for all speeds in the framework of OpenFOAM”. In: Computer Physics Communications 185.10 (2014), pp. 2730–2741. [CrossRef]
  15. Shen Chun et al. “Implementation of densitybased implicit LU-SGS solver in the framework of OpenFOAM”. In: Advances in Engineering Software 91 (2016), pp. 80–88. [CrossRef]
  16. Šimurda David, Fürst Jiří, and Luxa Martin. “3D flow past transonic turbine cascade SE 1050 - Experiment and numerical simulations”. In: Journal of Thermal Science 22.4 (2013), pp. 311–319. [CrossRef]
  17. Toro Eleuterio F. “The HLL and HLLC Riemann Solvers”. In: Riemann Solvers and Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1997, pp. 293–311. [CrossRef]
  18. Venkatakrishnan V. “On the accuracy of limiters and convergence to steady state solutions”. In: 31st Aerospace Sciences Meeting & Exhibit (1993), pp. 1–10.
  19. Keith Walters, D. and Cokljat Davor. “A three-equation eddy-viscosity model for Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes simulations of transitional flow”. In: Journal of Fluids Engineering 130.12 (2008), pp. 121401–121401–14. [CrossRef]
  20. Weller H. G. et al. “A tensorial approach to computational continuum mechanics using objectoriented techniques”. In: Computers in Physics 12.6 (1998), p. 620. [CrossRef]
  21. Xisto Carlos M., Páscoa José C., and OLIVEIRA Paulo J. “A pressure-based high resolution numerical method for resistive MHD”. In: Journal of Computational Physics 275.151 (2014), pp. 323–345. [CrossRef]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.