Open Access
EPJ Web Conf.
Volume 156, 2017
Regional Conference on Nuclear Physics (RCNP 2016)
Article Number 00012
Number of page(s) 13
Published online 23 October 2017
  1. N. Siu, and G. Apostolakis, A methodology for analyzing the detection and suppression of fires in nuclear power plants. Nucl. Sci. Eng. J., 94: 3 (1986). [Google Scholar]
  2. Berg H.P. and Hauschild J., Probabilistic Assessment of Nuclear Power Plant Protection Against External Explosions. Nuclear Power- Practical Aspects. (2012). [Google Scholar]
  3. J. Hauschild and H.-P. Berg, How to Assess External Explosion Pressure Wave. Elect. J. of Int. Group on Rel., 01: 24 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  4. S. J. Jeon, B. M Jin and Y. J. Kim. Assessment of the fire resistance of a nuclear power plant subjected to a large commercial aircraft crash. Nucl. Eng. and Design, 247 p 11–22 (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. HSE, A Review of the State-of-the-Art in Gas Explosion Modelling, H.S.L. C. J. Lea, Buxton. p. 80 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Ismaila, R.M. Kasmani and A.T. Ramli, Consequence Assessment of Vapour Cloud Explosion Involving Large Commercial Airliner Crash upon Nuclear Reactor Containment, Chem. Eng. Trans., 56, (2017) (to be published). [Google Scholar]
  7. K.B. Mishra, K.D. Wehrstedt, and H. Krebs, Lessons learned from recent fuel storage fires. Fuel Proc. Tech., 107 p. 166–172 (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. F. Rigas, and S. Sklavounos, Risk and consequence analyses of hazardous chemicals in marshalling yards and warehouses at Ikonio/Piraeus harbour, Greece. J. of Loss Prev. in the Process Indus., 15(6): p. 531–544 (2002). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. F.B.A. Beshara, Modelling of blast loading on aboveground structures—II. Internal blast and ground shock. Comp. & Stru., 51(5): p. 597–606 (1994). [Google Scholar]
  10. Baker, W.E., Cox, P. A., Westine, P. S., . Kulesz, J. J. and Strehlow, R. A., Explosion Hazards and Evaluation. Elsevier (1983). [Google Scholar]
  11. P.M. Locking, The Trouble with TNT Equivalence in 26th International Ballistics Symposium., Miami, FL. (2011). [Google Scholar]
  12. A.C. van den Berg, The multi-energy method: A framework for vapour cloud explosion blast prediction. J. of Hazard. Mat., 12(1): p. 1–10 (1985). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. W.P.M. Mercx, A. C. van den Berg, C. J. Hayhurst, Developments in vapour cloud explosion blast modeling. J. of Hazardous Mater., 71(1-3): p. 301–319 (2000). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. J.A. Marc and E.K. Konstantinos, Fires, Explosions, and Toxic gas Dispersions: Effects calculation and Risk Analysis, United States: CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton,. 352 (2010). [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  15. A.R. Soman and G. Sundararaj, Consequence Assessment of Vapour cloud Explosion Involving Hydrogen Release. Int. J. of Emerging Tech. and Advanced Eng., 2(11): p. 291–297 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  16. IAEA, Design of Reactor Containment Systems for Nuclear Power Plants, International Atomic Energy Agency: Vienna (2004). [Google Scholar]
  17. Lees, F. P. Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2nd Ed., Butterworth- Heinemann, Boston MA, pages 7/64 and 17/249 (1996a). [Google Scholar]
  18. Netherlands Organisation of Applied Scientific Research [“TNO],“ Methods for the Determination of Possible Damage to People and Objects Resulting from Releases of Hazardous Materials”, CPR 16E (“green book”), Chapter 3, “The Consequences of Explosion Effects on Humans”, page 17 (1989). [Google Scholar]
  19. Finney, D.I., PROBIT Analysis, London: Camebridge University Press, (1971). [Google Scholar]
  20. IAEA, Site Evaluation for Nuclear Installations Safety Requirement, International Atomic Energy Agnecy: Vienna (2016). [Google Scholar]
  21. V.J. Clancey, Diagonostic Features of Explosion Damage, in 6th International Meeting on Forensic Science. 1972 Edinburg, Scotland. [Google Scholar]
  22. Kayes, P.J., Manual of Industrial Hazards Assessment Techniques. Technica. 1985, London. [Google Scholar]
  23. Santamaría, J.M. and P. Brana, Risk analysis and reduction in the chemical process industry. 1998, London Blackie Academic & Professional. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. J.r.m. Taveau, The Buncefield Explosion: Were the Resulting Overpressures Really Unforeseeable? Process Safety Prog., 31(1): p. 55–71 (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. D.M. Johnson, The potential for vapour cloud explosions - Lessons from the Buncefield accident. J. of Loss Prev. in the Process Indust., 23(6): p. 921–927 (2010). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.